Re: Is there an official Extension Headers List?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 22 May 2012 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E8E21F85EF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.672
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6b1fe8MVMrd for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63CF21F85B9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaaq13 with SMTP id q13so1837327eaa.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3vsbo6owOpw4suWuZN61xnNAxUBj66gmINKFWNcAgqU=; b=nIN0NlJ7T6iJa1TZsltDpXq4EQdvgZtIxqwl0tar8HKwqB13cdJmQi2vGbxWeRTBdE xnJvQO4PjmXwyhSytKZqZ+VdGDd+nEVPX8m8EYzxxBMLDp1AW1LD/F/BugmwCXxqSDtd kLFJnuCFRuy/u0sqkEIFgISR2TOqN3vvD64N/4cRKoB1sABsxKNzdkC4Nt9YSpA68fvz PmGEcaXw/iPMHwqrhHnkFyKihKGr2cTJDw7WljFBx/ZsTyrIRFBrWgC2dgm4APrmQTiW fS27uXZ8TcF9/MzUe/wUlvCV8BMt6YaELDzYljDJw4pWqCZ5NKblsSRNRgQhAYex/2uO 8E0g==
Received: by 10.14.95.199 with SMTP id p47mr4367375eef.22.1337701587762; Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-217-62.as13285.net. [2.102.217.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u10sm108464595eem.1.2012.05.22.08.46.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FBBB4CE.9040405@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:46:22 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Duncan, Jeremy" <jeremy.duncan@salientfed.com>
Subject: Re: Is there an official Extension Headers List?
References: <8A317FD8C00FEE448E52D4EE5B56BB3E022FC95C314E@RZJC1EX.jr1.local> <923297B868FB664FBFA90FCC255696DF025E70@BY2PRD0510MB366.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <923297B868FB664FBFA90FCC255696DF025E70@BY2PRD0510MB366.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'ipv6@ietf.org'" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:46:29 -0000

However, extension headers defined since 2460 have to be added.
That's the case for MIPv6, SHIM6 and HIP.

This matters - there are known to be boxes that discard packets
with a SHIM6 header, for example.

We do maybe need a little normative RFC on this.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2012-05-22 16:33, Duncan, Jeremy wrote:
> yes, sect 4 of RFC 2460:
> 
>    A full implementation of IPv6 includes implementation of the
>    following extension headers:
> 
>            Hop-by-Hop Options
>            Routing (Type 0)
>            Fragment
>            Destination Options
>            Authentication
>            Encapsulating Security Payload
> 
>    The first four are specified in this document; the last two are
>    specified in [RFC-2402] and [RFC-2406], respectively.
> 
> 4.1  Extension Header Order
> 
>    When more than one extension header is used in the same packet, it is
>    recommended that those headers appear in the following order:
> 
>            IPv6 header
>            Hop-by-Hop Options header
>            Destination Options header (note 1)
>            Routing header
>            Fragment header
> 
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2460.txt
> 
> 
> 010100110110010101101101011100000110010101110010001000000100011001101001
> 
> Jeremy Duncan
> Senior Director, IPv6 Network Architect Salient Federal Solutions, Inc.
> (Now including SGIS & Command Information Inc.)
> 4000 Legato Road, Suite 600 Fairfax, VA 22033
> Google Voice:  540.440.1193
> jeremy.duncan@salientfed.com
> ________________________________
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Marksteiner, Stefan [stefan.marksteiner@joanneum.at]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:04 AM
> To: 'ipv6@ietf.org'
> Subject: Is there an official Extension Headers List?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I just wonder if  any *official* summarization of currently existing IPv6 extension headers exists.
> The only way I found to determine all headers is to step through the IANA protocol numbers list and check in the references whether the according protocol has a defined IPv6 extension header.
> As far as I see it a complete current list would be:
> Hop-by-Hop Option                       0
> Routing Header                               43
> Fragment Header                           44
> AH                                                         51
> ESP                                                        50
> Destination Options                       60
> Mobility Header                              135
> Host Identity Protocol                   139
> Shim6 Protocol                                140
> 
> Is there something I missed or misinterpreted? Or is there actually an official list (a citable source would fit my needs best)?
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------