IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 19 November 2017 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0D01200C5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:45:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uzagrWQ1EWYd for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:45:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE2B91243FE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:45:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id F3C10AF; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:45:52 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1511102753; bh=+NC3aZfP8XHsfM2xkxsh7JQaLp4d2USYmE71m0VWMFg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ef0P3sPntkNYbTtnAAB5M7NS+oG+jTFHHv7piyN085FeVWFd1rsFxABMtNbZzR+kC //deRNVJFWtEHhPOidMFbM1jRI+Twn5SISdDHvAEYEQEjIvxSaUjVa88ctfs8saSkK JZbikqpLdRvIi8utf88y4/Dv2xDlnDuejXNmHNfM=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10939F; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:45:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:45:52 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQW7BA4BBnZ422cheFxUh0hjVYbdci60A=4yDxh9WfKOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711191545120.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <m1eEGbJ-0000EhC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <D43E103C-27B8-48CF-B801-ACCF9B42533E@employees.org> <m1eEHPS-0000FyC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <59B0BEC0-D791-4D75-906C-84C5E423291B@employees.org> <m1eEIGX-0000FjC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <73231F8D-498E-4C77-8DA8-044365368FC9@isc.org> <CAKD1Yr1aFwF_qZVp5HbRbKzcOGqn==MRe_ewaA8Qc8t3+CVu_Q@mail.gmail.com> <44A862B7-7182-4B3A-B46E-73065FC4D852@isc.org> <D42D8D7A-6D19-4862-9BB3-4913058A83B6@employees.org> <CAFU7BARCLq9eznccEtkdnKPAtKNT7Mf1bW0uZByPvxtiSrv6EQ@mail.gmail.com> <183A8772-6FEF-43BD-97F9-DD4A2E21DB90@google.com> <CAFU7BARaJHKOyrD1KAeorbYQwgsmxBLk1QELH+wZ4=HDCP1q-w@mail.gmail.com> <8470b00f-ecc5-0a63-fd8f-a4e2f65a005d@gmail.com> <CFDD8D9E-0726-46C1-9CC7-5C88DD111E9D@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711190939290.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAD6AjGQW7BA4BBnZ422cheFxUh0hjVYbdci60A=4yDxh9WfKOQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Q-BEqZ6ZS6HPy5O3GF2na2kXzeo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 14:45:57 -0000

On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Ca By wrote:

> Windows supports 464xlat
>
> https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/networking/2017/07/13/core-network-stack-features-in-the-creators-update-for-windows-10/

Only on 3GPP interfaces, not on regular NICs.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email