[IPv6]Re: Adoption call for <draft-hui-6man-stub-router-ra-flag>

[David Farmer <[e-mail]>]

I support the adoption of this draft.

Upon reading the draft, it should discuss possible interactions with
RA-Guard RFC6105 and RFC7113. Furthermore, it says, "Devices that do not
implement [I-D.ietf-snac-simple] MUST NOT set the stub router flag, and
MUST silently ignore the stub router flag." I think a likely exception to
this is devices that implement RA-Guard. It might be useful for such
devices to implement a policy based on the stub router flag, potentially
allowing RAs, within certain limits, from unknown stub routers but not
allowing RAs from unknown infrastructure routers.

Thanks.

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:03 AM Bob Hinden <[e-mail]> wrote:

> This email starts a 6MAN adoption call for the following document:
>
>   Title : Stub Router Flag in ICMPv6 Router Advertisement Messages
>   Author : Jonathan Hui
>   Pages : 4
>   Date : 2024-03-19
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hui-6man-stub-router-ra-flag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hui-6man-stub-router-ra-flag-00
>
> Substantive comments, statements of support for adopting this
> document or objections to the adoption should be sent to the mailing
> list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
>
> The adoption call ends on Thursday, 13 June 2024, 23:59 UTC.
>
> Bob, Jen, Ole
> 6MAN Chairs
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[e-mail]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: [phone]
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================