IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: problem with inetCidrRouteDest/inetCidrRoutePfxLen consistency check language in draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Wed, 04 February 2004 17:08 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15014 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:08:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQVe-0003LD-QA for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:08:21 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i14H8I3l012829 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:08:18 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQVe-0003Kq-BW for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:08:18 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA14995 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:08:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQVd-0003FB-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:08:17 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQUh-00039u-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:07:20 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQTt-00034W-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:06:29 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQTR-0002iT-Ro; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:06:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQSk-0002ej-Pz for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:05:18 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA14789 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:05:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQSf-0002vp-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:05:13 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQRh-0002om-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:04:14 -0500
Received: from merkur.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQQk-0002ds-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:03:14 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3F848C5; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:02:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from james.eecs.iu-bremen.de (unknown [212.201.47.18]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7902D847B8; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:02:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: by james.eecs.iu-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E27C82DF; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:02:38 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:02:38 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: problem with inetCidrRouteDest/inetCidrRoutePfxLen consistency check language in draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt
Message-ID: <20040204170238.GA1400@iu-bremen.de>
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
Mail-Followup-To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10402030759500.6936-100000@shell4.bayarea.net> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10402040720080.7633-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10402040720080.7633-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:34:58AM -0800, C. M. Heard wrote:

[...]
 
> It seems to me that an easy fix for this problem would be to alter
> the text to exclude the zone index from the comparison.  Here is
> my suggestion:
> 
>             The values for the index objects inetCidrRouteDest and
>             inetCidrRoutePfxLen must be consistent.  When the value
>             of inetCidrRouteDest (excluding the zone index, if one
>             is present) is x, then the bitwise logical-AND
>             of x with the value of the mask formed from the
>             corresponding index object inetCidrRoutePfxLen MUST be
>             equal to x.  If not, then the index pair is not
>             consistent and an inconsistentName error must be
>             returned on SET or CREATE requests.

This text is clearly an improvement over what has been there before.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status