Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDDA126D74 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RRdq_woHU_zh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470F712426E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 70so6189123pgf.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=CA2UsfkaxA3S30+BcjCZBpf7rZzgjTynKvkpAn/GngI=; b=qb7fhepb2wp17iogmMWGX78SZ2WsBAUBzvoXMkmPNLaqW5EyInQYLjl1ZVe/6+ECuj 0dw3W6EHdZEnYWLQbqzXvm+a5LoGMnNzfhT0oLProYgGj0y/+aDckJ8dnPMQk1gKJ4m6 H1AYXAuwoJAeT2Hy7VjEELPUQT4XGJDbEw1lzALh1lPvCmZ8LKDQNXHXnVjlv1UJGluV UyMOI02n6pB6AkCKslRxjs16WT4PHnx56NuwmGpj/+OALT0Nsq2wZDhyCAysvo/Uh5vM W9LKzWjnTNo39H4wuxBRlds5XK7SHAruHy2QCr8WsdGA4HOu2k1+w8dXTIf0/Iaa5fV5 tosg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=CA2UsfkaxA3S30+BcjCZBpf7rZzgjTynKvkpAn/GngI=; b=uNPkYA1OeQCrqaixSEaHg7YNBLVVj/iQhSXGJ0kVmHz6CSXOUIqkpcEkmdlq1q3H9G UyCbXvDZ3oxxpfKnIuSioBPFR1S5Y8G5pY0pxhebagkvzsMZn7sUmzw3GJwBDpTgk27x dLTU4lTdZO5RyOxXOKBduBi72pEymt6a6PJ+Nj2jMGev9D5z8fqDtvybOFRqrHUU31u6 /Q8/Xq1rm7qN2tIrmgWt3OnMFl24ULhkGElrXCizA3mMomdP3F++i8uQfzNUWpmUfWRl d58Bl3cfXV81gJFt9eHYXkXDSQyukOPYdg8tr1WGwog31+OZpKMkDw0wy49AMYpkaqy4 FGVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX76TFc5QGIw+Uin6uK7J8JDlXSztoN/ef/ZQAYmvOJdKTd3y6zt lTum2ZQ/OWYvbdrcSmmDlkd6We85WTc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaT+Xi7ned80seHmNtBhYtX3uyHxlgUuB6M+7PZCtj4lc75/phKBs354w/YjaDhSHdGhkYb/A==
X-Received: by 10.84.240.73 with SMTP id h9mr10457873plt.388.1510773315770; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::10e7:10:788d:282:9de1:e7b9? ([2620:0:10e7:10:788d:282:9de1:e7b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c185sm44391937pfb.112.2017.11.15.11.15.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:14 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <D75288D5-B571-46EB-A35E-0DBD79F930E5@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C0734A14-AB91-4CFC-851E-211F25558DFD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:15:18 -0800
In-Reply-To: <m1eEvEP-0000G3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-4@u-1.phicoh.com>
References: <f9805855-68cf-a3e8-a13f-c6ac31b09058@gmail.com> <bbd4e1d2-047f-6758-76f8-fd591c51dad7@gmail.com> <D631CE54.8C0F5%lee@asgard.org> <m1eEvEP-0000G3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/QtMMs9JfRC09-LNRJG7Eg24B6DY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:15:18 -0000

On Nov 15, 2017, at 02:47, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-4@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
> The safest option to do that is a DHCPv4 option that says 'no IPv4 service here, go away'.


Better: extend ARP with a signal that says, “ARP is not welcome here."

--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>