Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 13 February 2021 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E757F3A0A65 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 06:54:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRLS-K3gEGsn for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 06:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFB63A0958 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 06:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id c1so1898460qtc.1 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 06:54:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=j473vsP7v0gZnOa3eVxPR3TeJQ04+flMBLcYf0I7Wpk=; b=nVaww+uo4R3iUocLVfjCbG2/AAITDgV3oIjmm06VfwRA87C7FhpmqJaX+60dh6kCSE Gdg6maSZZKZlE+zZoJ1atPxmnUIyDMNDNSDEx963fWcGxBXLExMQL1VMPNp+GhW/A+eA EPLa8O1wwQd5hsZ52BZQeYDfTJVow53VhC5OQvNrRAard9JASsyBbk/9ZK0Mwf1iQr8j 9O68yAzX6qA8ohmuGXpHlZVweDdVnDNyoaxaQdyBnmz/Cy8Oc2U3U8aXwwJ7k+lnpWs6 wGqVLhjfVkqvk9TzZMqugFXoIcDkWi6xP7ijcXh4CAXMYzTcFmAIoN2N7CDQy/cIyC33 3lLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=j473vsP7v0gZnOa3eVxPR3TeJQ04+flMBLcYf0I7Wpk=; b=VUJp5JPYbvEvzZp0oKk2t0aXpAtfshJeuWdBKOxcdcDE2Bf4F3Ckq0oE+aiV5TR156 evueyQ3iI9iIET7K9ZVpa06Xbp0JmGDVVPWWSScI7P/jbuoqifOEBWXvo2w7WYpvee0O lBx5XoItnzI3MZluegcskAFolytbarMCaq3Agp7XGJeq7D/OwUukGoePM2FB2Z4LPQeD bdhifq8b5CaOj/k3XT0IVBmly4r9blKzmnWOzZjmtJgIS8+wTGafeGmDO/C9hfOmbcfK tOiD0Yvb+lJ3qfI51f51MlPv9bHPZWUh9usdRNIj5QdhirP4MI7JEYhOveTZRBVxcP8D 5Cww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306m5kfyHYPO3ZqREuPW9D7l8mgMLg+a1eZH+KkADcQvalGz1yb 8WjiIM1tSb/hWeAUpPXiJeIy5Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymxfessa8SJhy/fbtwC9iMVSJHnPE4y3B9jLxs+5j8wS/Lt19CPgVrX131OysuIQ0Z3/j8zQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:220a:: with SMTP id o10mr7037032qto.280.1613228092481; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 06:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm8304955qkc.61.2021.02.13.06.54.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Feb 2021 06:54:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <5D1FBC37-1024-4300-AFA5-19F329E9F1D1@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3C222D1F-382F-4316-8617-1C5F3A0BBA57"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.32\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:54:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <a3fbfb94-90ae-961c-a2ab-33ade27e074e@si6networks.com>
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <160989494094.6024.7402128068704112703@ietfa.amsl.com> <6fe3a45e-de65-9f88-808d-ea7e2abdcd16@si6networks.com> <F4E00812-E366-4520-AE17-7BB46E28D575@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau3iOjjU+FLpdtA7nqfKRX+sjjSanAU8U-O3pH-k5nSoig@mail.gmail.com> <a3fbfb94-90ae-961c-a2ab-33ade27e074e@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Qy5_PyWTu65abhFBKXW3Fillov8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:55:00 -0000

On Feb 13, 2021, at 4:19 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> Well, whether we call it out or not, as per RFC4007:
> 
>              scope(LL) < scope(ULA) < scope(GUA)
> 
> So it's more about acknowledging facts than about introducing or needing a new scope.  The same applies to the addresses you mentioned before.

No. scope(LL) < scope(ULA) and scope(LL) < scope(GUA) but scope(ULA) ? scope(GUA). That is, any particular ULA may or may not be global in scope.

The problem with admin scope is that it’s not a definitional scope, but rather an operational scope. Which may be the problem—we are using the term “scope” when that’s not specific enough—we could mean “by definition” or “in practice” scope, but we aren’t making that clear.  Of course, these are illustrative terms—I’m not saying we should switch to this terminology.