[IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32
sthaug@nethelp.no Thu, 04 December 2025 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87689521A06; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 23:09:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id syf6eygXdBu9; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 23:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.4]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC2795219FC; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 23:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.4]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC92C647370; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 08:09:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 08:09:05 +0100
Message-Id: <20251204.080905.1634665662186047818.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: markzzzsmith@gmail.com
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2zY527bMZ3cC9ebDFAHt++-W5ONY7dNhZpLy5AeJDGMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2xaZnsua3b0u3HFPVomy-kWP5YAd3Tu1zXy_Yb-NfhkqA@mail.gmail.com> <B4DC82F6-FEB9-4072-B0B3-4400654ED8B6@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zY527bMZ3cC9ebDFAHt++-W5ONY7dNhZpLy5AeJDGMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.10 on Emacs 30.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: W5THNKRBYEG5TZ6JBJDFYLRAJYM3XBI4
X-Message-ID-Hash: W5THNKRBYEG5TZ6JBJDFYLRAJYM3XBI4
X-MailFrom: sthaug@nethelp.no
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ipv6@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/R1hmyJRouHXaFa_8bA0YHdxdFLI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>
> Surely people aren't using a documentation prefix in labs?! That's > what ULAs are for. Configuration examples from the documentation are very easy to use in a lab with cut and paste. Steinar Haug, AS2116
- [IPv6]Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: [v6ops] Re: Why not… Mark Smith
- [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: Why… Ole Trøan
- [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: Why… Mark Smith
- [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 sthaug
- [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re:… Daryll Swer
- [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: Why… Nick Buraglio