Re: Updating to RFC6434 to deal with 8200-style header insertion by IPIP

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Mon, 06 November 2017 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FD213FB75 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:01:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MW_rS58Aq_qU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2AB13FB66 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.67] (unknown [181.165.119.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EFA280764; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:01:52 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Updating to RFC6434 to deal with 8200-style header insertion by IPIP
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <CAOSSMjUVCSBjbYu3bc7DU+edz2+0+RvU_AMi4FNn2n2075kk9g@mail.gmail.com> <6286.1509408085@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <f9447eb6-fca1-e54c-ff0b-abafa5986960@gmail.com> <25055.1509413008@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <B5488438-0F4B-4362-9B34-6B6FB74D5A49@employees.org> <19111.1509476559@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <37279216-12e5-f914-c2c0-63e165401b6c@gont.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:52:37 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19111.1509476559@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/R6hOLpDo_nevSJEPYjh_arz9dsQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:01:59 -0000

On 10/31/2017 04:02 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
>     > Without having thought very much about it... I do think requiring a
>     > host to accept tunnelled packets to itself by default or not, requires
>     > further considerations.
> 
> I agree: it requires further consideration.

If you feel like doing/proposing this, some thoughts of th top of my head:

* Beware of the Hop Limit, this thing may allow to circumvent GSTM --
think about remote ND attacks... even remote SLAAC.

* You might need to validate source/destination addresses as packets get
decapsulated (e.g., think about scopes)

* Strong end strong end system model and weak end system models might
(or not) apply here [rfc1112]

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1