IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND

Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com> Sat, 11 January 2014 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ayourtch@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33501ADF46 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:44:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B73wRt73eLXs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-x232.google.com (mail-qe0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146D81AC829 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 1so5798731qec.37 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:44:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UyF1YPsRYsMiqdGvMJFSG5jhU7A+Q+RzG73+G89Wbb0=; b=ta6f/lYj0XAUBk0IZzz8E0OB7171T0aTY1NODlxOKANqLrt/ydJuTYmigp13aF7DcI 080qwRs/dUgn9j47j7zTYRryfC2OeAEbDDbZcY9uZOxAK84gK9WFLIZDPACW79C6wVFh 0cSK53pPjvQO+kQujk6ZuclDNI57tJPu7klvdUKH4eEUE1w4ZfjfwzX3BNS246CMf0ce QKFktxQGAmO3uSOCxKfx6k/NG1J5/WrWnpquBMzFsFUc4ZKzxUOB2SBF9FSD4rgXyR57 scGqm7u5LXhq735OUo7nYXYb4hZcDnZDH+E6EUjxGXX74pmNrRKYwmDDqMGR+mr0L/rs tL9A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.53.100 with SMTP id a4mr22488268qep.44.1389473059578; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:44:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.133.39 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:44:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr29S=O5L4DfhNoiVieWPkgBJ2veuOu6ig5rwgK4ELz7Xw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr29S=O5L4DfhNoiVieWPkgBJ2veuOu6ig5rwgK4ELz7Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:44:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPi140Ohm=uxDfptZOb2yXY+cw9ihsbLak1jux8bqU__6HpzBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND
From: Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:17:40 -0800
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:44:33 -0000

On 1/11/14, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:

> An NS is 72 bytes, and if we do multicast snooping, then a sleeping node is
> only ever going to be woken up if a node with the same last 3 address bytes
> shows up. That should be extremely rare.

Found this:

http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~snoeren/papers/slomo-nsdi13.pdf

The exhibit of interest is table 1: if I interpret it correctly,
merely receiving the frame is 30% more power consumption compared to
idle.

--a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email