Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 06 May 2021 20:05 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2373A2FD6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EeDkFNOqhRVE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BF23A2FA8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id p12so8669659ljg.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wlq2OOhstKPUIXveXh5lQ6LlJ93YdouJn7nhnSg0u0c=; b=VIZryPcaf9oVZSbsxWIIrq8A7BtUODTjUPCXQwWDZNvWr7tILe3ed83C2Uaf7GrUQJ 8LZjD9QxFeXHmKQkj3NH16exI87peKX5AsjwaYN+4wIUKJtdTYdPLgPtcnXrxlSLehVT t/p8QlGT7XnflWMs0BrvGU2jjmY7pREI3qvs3yQzPD0wwy76rpayRhZqcjsB/VQg/x7s MYg1F6+fn3X5zxblJWhzGQTjcG7XUVtzkgbAPTqtBfd0pqIFwkNpE0wZK1wWSJ5W5bRD Ben//YZkUdsOswH1JAXPSV6ktZs0CySSBkNJ4aBBx6yeyQrQbZZyKWgbjOxYs/CTUd/8 lyIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wlq2OOhstKPUIXveXh5lQ6LlJ93YdouJn7nhnSg0u0c=; b=ke2hN15Dy4Ty8v8zZVIyk4sjUXKF+GbIVfy2oTF+YQBYQw4dnDwM+R3S/BX7d6Efw0 5o6EryfoiIaOgzBlfMVlU7uVckpd8ZakcYPj+Qpvdhxs40wWhoBjx3kLArfe2UKMhCR7 dvlZ8Ilz6gsPs0G+wZqyWyj1b0qkJ4CWpUNmSB+KYnBdwwrK26CymF73UsfIivw6EZxz B7mnhSXpr1nnbYvvFc0tEPQmVhPIMoc4welYNDRV6D7My/qaiHtJH++agXC7s7rP3jzu qgfLwPGyIqjH6jaCr8Xvda3h7ZP/yfaFCi4ZJ9YXNL7GHbuXgPVFiX5zsUFjSj/AOFOg Sb8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308fM1pRlZVB5iwT5pH5GLj5ZKLCYJ9rvFpCXwhyocow1BhIC25 NquQQTPp393Pd+yrdgRo1NpCwDDdqld8zh8ptfnskg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWeC9jCR3iLEfQtvs+UcAQCGt+tONv5XDybel1eyU2r0yBHaUV9lYrUIozu1ztb0/FgYbHOxtOonFAunLAJCc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4c6:: with SMTP id r6mr4833630ljm.37.1620331505208; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4f22f9591c0a48d1a351f52318cd3319@boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f22f9591c0a48d1a351f52318cd3319@boeing.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 22:04:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHxh5UmUsPOmun+XGPcBK0=AGLzSpx7Nemni1WzPnta9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
To: "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c95ecc05c1aed323"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/RLhMLdXvwqPTaqBdEkG0EHrD4FM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:05:14 -0000
All, May I ask why this topic is being taken outside of IETF ? Is it so difficult to create a new list ? Or is this so off topic to say ipv6 or 6man lists that it can not be discussed there ? Thx, Robert On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 9:09 PM Manfredi (US), Albert E < albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> wrote: > This is something that ought to be of interest to organizations which want > to use their own semantics, in the IPv6 prefixes. There was some discussion > on 6man some time ago, in which the assumption appeared to be, such a thing > is already viable. > > Bert > > -----Original Message----- > From: routing-discussion <routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf > Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2021 05:49 > To: irtf-discuss@irtf.org; routing-discussion@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic > Addressing > > EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments. > > Dear all, > > Back in March we posted an initial draft to open the discussion of research > related to routing based on additional meaning assigned to IP addresses, > and > to routing based on fields other than the destination address field of an > IP > packet. That draft attracted some comments, and one thing was clear: we > needed to split the draft into a survey of work that has happened / is > happening, and a discussion of the challenges to routing together with the > research question. > > So we have done this now (sorry it took so long) and have posted: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-semantic-routing-survey/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing/ > > These new drafts do not pick up all of the comments received (we focused on > the split), but we hope to address the comments in new revisions soon. > > At the same time, we have set up a dedicated mailing list for discussion of > "Semantic Addressing Routing and Hardware" (SARAH) at sarah@jiscmail.ac.uk > . > This is an academic, research-based community where we can discuss all > aspects of the drafts, introduce our research to each other, and advertise > related conference activity. You can subscribe at > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=SARAH. > > We hope the new list will help to focus discussion and avoid spamming > existing mailing lists. > > Looking forward to hearing your opinions. > > Adrian and Dan > > _______________________________________________ > routing-discussion mailing list > routing-discussion@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of S… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Robert Raszuk
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Nick Hilliard
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Brian E Carpenter
- RE: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Dirk Trossen
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Nick Hilliard
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Robert Raszuk
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Nick Hilliard