IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2011 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BFD11E8096 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:52:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D4DrMsiM4o6J for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D393411E8089 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eaad1 with SMTP id d1so2665283eaa.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:52:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xHjKsuK8hQDsQWyVCm+25G64aeaYCvpYsRgHtd9uQt4=; b=hJWuWlCS1lV1Gi81HGGVt//oCD0RdWZ3yM5725dYPB0koAyVjUTlKkg11fwRmh+Eqe UkpHNozPwOchDaUsVlPFIJGTtNEAS8iaPge8FrtkGx7PGTPZMckgyBo8YfxuDBIg108r JYEsrBbK4HmBRekFwDBBoebWn+udRpK4ysOtc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.9.218 with SMTP id m26mr2386307bkm.44.1323985929640; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:52:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.70.17 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:52:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EEA5793.8080800@gmail.com>
References: <4EB3F3D6.4090302@innovationslab.net> <CAC1-dtnas++ahkBmpdyq7DbyAEg0W6bZY16qGzKmsP10vC39FQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EEA3D20.7020603@innovationslab.net> <CAKFn1SFvs0PzBXtEWWo814Oe5TJmbQEJBm5FeYJY5xzrr=KFSw@mail.gmail.com> <4EEA5793.8080800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:52:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SHA-=cQ_=5rJVLVMvQYXoTL_D1dCR=uWZK-qFrcGp6P-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:52:12 -0000

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, the end of my conversation is at
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg14948.html
>
> Summary: "an update that makes it easy for the implementer to find the changes is better."
>
> If it wasn't clear, I believe this document is technically done and needs
> to be advanced, but it does need editorial work as indicated above.

Hmm sorry for being unclear, the technical part looked okay as far as
I could tell, but as the quoted words from you, it will probably be
more confusing to have two documents where the last one update/change
the first one. Would be much better to have just one
replacing/updating the old one.



--- Roger J ---

>
> Also there was Dave's review:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg14984.html
>
> In IESG parlance that all seems like "new I-D needed" to me.
>
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
>
>
> On 2011-12-16 08:07, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2011 7:32 PM, "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>     Unfortunately, the draft is in a limbo state at this point.  The WG
>>> Last Call ended about a month ago with zero comments or statements of
>>> support.  The chairs cannot advance this document without some show of
>>> support by the community.
>>>
>>>     I humbly request that members of the working group review this
>>> draft and post their comments, questions, and suggestions to the mailing
>>> list.
>>
>> Brian Carpenter said it all in this post:
>>
>> Message-ID: <4EB9D332.1040003@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:11:14 +1300
>> From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
>>
>> <snip>
>> Reading this document as a proposed standard, I think it will confuse
>> the reader. I think that what we actually need is a 100% replacement
>> of RFC 3484, that can be read on its own.
>> </snip>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           |
rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email