IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt - textual representation of prefixes

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 04 March 2017 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C40129594 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:29:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-3-739kjieV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A18261294F7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 25so54259720pgy.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fF5vQAGrpv3v6rKCJG/D3op5OTYyN+u4Z6964R3LF5c=; b=B0JG9nu/pUAQJCFJGCckh89m3iYLa/RjDLBRTiW61LiHO8a40k6kimYzFQqXNzjdgB P9azSnrsXtLe791zY2qwsNM7WWRQRbpLtx3dgKebc3pmXmswU9Oe4S9ju5kIihw2UC5J lrFZxubyZsc3kwagROsDOwFyBYPRcGrB/9+6R92z6kxv+Qw9GKrNMR7mNrRjIDZ9h1Yn WJu9f6UUkEAQvtXPg/o9G+qPydHAZTK84EYWoswMYhWrebg+583tOQnrcOuSQm8ZPIl3 q71qs2D+2K9S/itIW0KLZwyM9gG8oitVdnuQL4owNKjQrrTDeGfGk0YexXCCgwwVLX/T QHiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fF5vQAGrpv3v6rKCJG/D3op5OTYyN+u4Z6964R3LF5c=; b=TlXNOq4R7MWPVLtp+eNNKiaBv8mMu854DFIXdT4NBULcpnX4zVgH2MN01DfXK1ehkF 3DZsPkJ0ephvpaRxn7E+BcieBTT3cFfkhMQ3FYWYmfenO6wEe9eYnrYCGELdxj7JSaIx aCIayfYBkzpZhYEbQcqk6hrPqZwNUm/4E0ffc9g8++99gFPecdaCn0V+rt1XCeUbq3ez hT+NPVOwUVRznv42c6dCGt+qam2SGKzb8UwxW1MelRb0eMVUK53d9jAaIpZID9lsmyfi Pcxj197vtnCvqfbZ6qqx5ilP2qi0Dj4MitndgqkDmBzDLj8ADeQySNdxBTuO+YNquNkc /KbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lUopTibjO+vo3Epu/k1eHpytgV+XRmSSptxwID8eXXf3V76SO8Dgu4H8UDm5DRHw==
X-Received: by 10.84.224.74 with SMTP id a10mr14115867plt.28.1488655789250; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7204:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7204:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y21sm30789530pgh.52.2017.03.04.11.29.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:29:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt - textual representation of prefixes
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <20170223134026.GI5069@gir.theapt.org> <CAO42Z2z7v4gDk91b6Of-1sczV88m3B9kzn0MeJU_VBJ416k6Ww@mail.gmail.com> <ae35b45a-0398-840f-fc0d-1f64dd2fcc58@gmail.com> <37851ee3-03be-8bee-6190-f4d28df86305@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703012051590.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <b5784622-c24e-a531-4e68-249b03701941@gmail.com> <CAAedzxrSTFe0GgYuvtXPNE=R_ZCXotxL7HbKdj5A4-869rncmw@mail.gmail.com> <ba025be6-709d-87b4-f388-d6f143408277@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703021029010.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4e17a9f4-6daf-787f-0321-3327fe601d70@gmail.com> <bead3cd8-f7f9-37b3-66f9-e76ae94056d1@baanhofman.nl> <63d98caf-ab70-088f-ff6b-ad27a11619e0@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcOLSK061p_biSD3GK1y464Ld=8Zp3-hAuJqQ2R2t3JRw@mail.gmail.com> <68803ac3-97f4-838c-ffd2-a294d7fb6d0d@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqc7cFrhCaiGMGeSUf1zMsXpcoDUVvYQ13L-Soe4Rwf6RA@mail.gmail.com> <a630f8b8-e6ed-885a-a909-6c75dfd79892@gmail.com> <49C3F649-FEC9-430E-B716-D5608E00D385@gmail.com> <23d0ed53-918f-dec0-1914-57f2e31bccc9@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <401d81b3-f8e5-d38c-826b-167ca6b1f917@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 08:29:44 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <23d0ed53-918f-dec0-1914-57f2e31bccc9@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/RaYWClHXMvlZ4wL36KkWiMsQrf8>
Cc: IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 19:29:51 -0000

On 05/03/2017 01:09, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Fred,
> 
> I think the problem I have - agreed, on my side - is that "fe80::/10" is
> sometimes read as a link-local address, other times as a prefix
> configured on a computer, other times as just the first 10bits of an LL
> address.

It's a prefix. ("Point, à la ligne.", comme on dit en francais.)

The problem isn't there. It's that in a router, a prefix is the thing
you perform longest match against. In a host, it's what you use in
source address selection, next-hop router selection, and on-link
determination, and during address auto-configuration. So it has
many roles.

And fe80::/x is just a special case. No way round that. Also, it's
meaningless without an interface, but we don't write fe80::/10%eth0.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email