Re: [v6ops] RFC7084

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2323A1AE30D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s5I-FoGW1jd0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A0A1AE307 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUqfHSgjg4NwbDWXQevs7atT0Aux28b+p@postini.com; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:43 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD341B82D7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E380190043; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:42 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7084
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <021E64FECA7E5A4699562F4E667164810B4BF931@XCH-PHX-503.sw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:00:40 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <855909DF-9009-4228-AE31-B436753E58D8@nominum.com>
References: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DC7BB@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B0269@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DCD72@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312100803370.24602@uplift.swm.pp.se> <F92E1B55-C74B-400C-B83E-6B50D175D121@steffann.nl> <7B4820C5-B562-4BE7-8C6A-CBCDABC39728@nominum.com> <52A749CE.7020605@inex.ie> <021E64FECA7E5A4699562F4E667164810B4BF931@XCH-PHX-503.sw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:00:49 -0000

On Dec 10, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Manfredi, Albert E <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> wrote:
> I don't see any contradiction here. If M=0 and O=1, the full address assignment isn't available in the DHCPv6 server. However, prefixes may well be.

That's certainly not an unreasonable assumption, but don't forget the per-prefix 'a' bit, which controls slaac...