IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1189131827; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVjRl2TDWQuj; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x235.google.com (mail-ua0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8374D1315A7; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 72so15285013uaf.3; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LDzdPKwtU2L7kdWIFxVhAgLtziivGxboU2IdORfil0s=; b=FYqgt4AZEPig3nXIyqnTEbdVlPaXokyT5A23zlKyoLbZCjBW5n3c1gt8qhKmxJUBb5 vLBnEaEgd7bab32wX9+6FLtyBRtigiSbtmWuZDlg/06nktc5EBRDZX512Ah4Xm9h0oYa ipyudZWlq2g2dLUyPL6W8xcBWybV54QIiE+XRS/FUMCh0tusjv8IL1rU7rv3W3gmS645 /x4C8NwEIaI0p1evnt963pxlK01dBSrinuz/zc2afm6Y7zxzrU95fKd1uhwHqh9Jb2di rbZjBBE5Odcuk57fVRdVQ18vnj5N3bQJkLrmRxcdvtH01TRsvt+asmkFNEMKxSKjS2O4 taUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LDzdPKwtU2L7kdWIFxVhAgLtziivGxboU2IdORfil0s=; b=l9DD0UZHLai+ssaAlLqgbJffIhrXI+Q59BA86a8QaqnD42EcuzCkzVwQZFil4yn6fn 6wJgWaDvyTfv4W85i+RKbBr0lzGHKzN8ffmtV+A01O1IyqB6Gl4R3Nsa8csrvGao2AEp rsOpN+ZWZotfDcmz2oxiKveDeG65RLs6edamPegH1FEO7fZpXxUngUKESIT3+8FRlmif h0LymlqbiUnbFxWZzVkomlVIRor5/Gsyo11lxpE/Nt3P05jistjKerPg0LcQ6lF8fBWr sTTKUgXn50uGY6UID/dVZHjZia+QOAmKzn3e8h90cmHcNMTellzwLSyp6I1UwzqqyMTU 7Xcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H10VTVRHtmfyLgisMexC0CI6Gd8HVvHILSTd0T3XgX9xa0WLkOKtb2S0+m0SxI9QCpr6/cmvC9/awARfA==
X-Received: by 10.159.40.226 with SMTP id d89mr2160544uad.98.1489610369643; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.142.207 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <887bd0f0-32a5-56f1-9ac9-703ecb97a760@gmail.com>
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <37ED3E78-B23A-4D29-8597-5A63236129B1@cisco.com> <887bd0f0-32a5-56f1-9ac9-703ecb97a760@gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:38:58 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2w623z=As6a1t2CLaO+pwOyvckvw9AOxG-mn=cVy-h--g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/SbAit7tmstRAocuGY3n0U-TOkPw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:39:32 -0000

On 16 March 2017 at 03:16, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stefano,
> On 16/03/2017 04:55, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
> ...
>> In the mean time, I think it is way too premature to come to conclusion on what text should be used for RFC2460bis and I recommend that the current text is left unchanged until we figured out what to do with EH insertion.
>
> I believe that we have figured it out: extension header insertion is harmful to Internet interoperability.

I and others were going to work on an ID describing why, however the
other co-authors seem to have disappeared. I'll start putting together
what I have over the next week.


Regards,
Mark.


>
> I fully agree with Suresh's understanding of the rough consensus.
>
>    Brian
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email