[IPv6]Re: [v6ops] New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"

Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org> Thu, 27 November 2025 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <msweet@msweet.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF4D91BB809; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 07:59:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qT74vLG6Gml6; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 07:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC5891BB7FB; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 07:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E46E2803DC; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:59:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org E46E2803DC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1764259141; bh=yKP6hsdv8xJ4CyFW4rUy9zqNU/jGXaXT4XEjPGXPPwI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=Lk8m62Xijqtoav2Tv6WEoR9AEX99PlJ3yt44fmtXq/e/Sn83yrRlPKIicEJygfUbC hirLKECy6Fm3wX9L7kbcD55jXK+FSJCv5EocC9aUINCkpuj8vgZPeE/mGm7jq6MIIp gKeLb1k6JjUc0pjnFmvKZX9+e2sne8QT/NcWC+ms=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.300.41.1.4\))
From: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
In-Reply-To: <a6d3681e-f9dd-4c4a-b18f-6d600096556e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 10:58:49 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04B0AE57-3886-41C2-9F81-E7419D62998B@msweet.org>
References: <CAO42Z2wmCYvqpCGn6LxLW0otHS0kqmS6jGXkXqLtcKhPJn9eMQ@mail.gmail.com> <38F85990-939F-47AA-9A04-24EEC29E4F41@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2ykz37BOKpxxHVhwGKzQfTCLokbcU7wCg9-SDWoK+ahhg@mail.gmail.com> <1FCD4A72-65B5-40D4-AEBA-A7EB1CE3FA6F@msweet.org> <5bdb1de3-7901-4665-b7ed-43344c2192d8@gmail.com> <1FD6AE49-9AF6-4BB2-A458-CD3B5407D757@msweet.org> <a6d3681e-f9dd-4c4a-b18f-6d600096556e@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.300.41.1.4)
Message-ID-Hash: VH3KXYXRA4H4CLSIUCL4HVDJEGST7ORH
X-Message-ID-Hash: VH3KXYXRA4H4CLSIUCL4HVDJEGST7ORH
X-MailFrom: msweet@msweet.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Ole Trøan <otroan.ietf@gmail.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Geoff Huston <gih902@gmail.com>, IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/SgLM3Ov3WAleTdja2MAVe2k1qnY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>

Brian,

> On Nov 26, 2025, at 11:14 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Michael,
> 
> On 27-Nov-25 10:47, Michael Sweet wrote:
>> Brian,
>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 3:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> (d) as far as my experiments went, mDNS on Linux has messed up support for link-local addresses, which all need a zoneid because of (b). Which is probably the real reason that ::/96 would work on Linux virtual interfaces but fe80::/10 wouldn't.
>> I haven't noticed any particular issues with my Linux laptop or VMs using Avahi, although for my home office the Wi-Fi and Ethernet are treated as a single LAN (Ubiquity DM Pro + a bunch of APs and switches) so it is possible I am just "lucky".  
> 
> The problems that I saw are described in the README at https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/tree/main/zelect

Avahi doesn't want to compete with another mDNS resolver on the same machine, so I think your observations can be distilled down to "ping6 and Chrome don't handle IPv6LL addresses obtained via mDNS".  I can dig a bit to see where the breakage is happening - more than likely the numeric address is getting copied without the zone ID, leading to the failure.

FWIW, Linux support for IPv4LL is also problematic - it works but not all of the implementations (there are several...) actually implement RFC 3927 correctly.

________________________
Michael Sweet