RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C043A08DD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=TkHHZvN6; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=EqEm8Tc+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14Kc962DTI8Y for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2133C3A08DC for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04TDwdjf011158; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:58:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=fAD4IJpp5fcUh/lMt+TAP1yeA1o4RK3Df0m6Qdfh4x8=; b=TkHHZvN66a+4iI9zjuaiIRwofq6DNRyMh03mOGaD+Rr19cpwuek9k1mIuQC/ogtKmtbk cHVaS7FY67fCxFo9rOPLwbtaahkOzMN0DkxhG3O70Sv52xIqcNcFGVZwIuZiPAZviLkM aNZaYtomDLoWGn4XyeV5KNi8DIlZmsejl6L4l5sT8xcCSmnH8RWjFv5r7Fp1QOnE112p 7GgRvbLZTkF/Hcb8R7R0lWAWgeTB8Nc9YJBQT+8EgtCeZlbrNC3l6sxaajElHUWc9R7K O0iBdPl2G54Du+MqsuD5Uxz0yX8XNlTKVRfTJEY5wOKX49yns/TYx2tZ2HI63lf0mWIf 5w==
Received: from nam10-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10lp2109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.109]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 319w28ume2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 May 2020 06:58:39 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dZaVgq40lwdPFJUtZAnL+9e+opTR8nJECzPxD5Fh6S0tnFiY16qG83oVX8insiVie1kGvC6JWCiwamGEPFq/jtgYwW6h9jaLsqDkmf7+Mg1InSbKljPShBMdjcnzadxoL8rf3oxGOuvFoZYqN4B45DX6Fl6KNXq3ZVpW8jw2ZDMxWzlZX0Ae1b4bREYuyc0I+Meq8MgOFUsbDIzYuttUDjay8kQbuNJ2NSE5aufS++yjmhODKVzu5gTfXdu8VbbNuhmaFgOYuAwQcecKxziTR2hKigZ3VOIpP/vnS2P2miPkWwvOZtX1IZSs4RpNJQSa2kbIAiRQ6lUmx1WYy9RtYA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=fAD4IJpp5fcUh/lMt+TAP1yeA1o4RK3Df0m6Qdfh4x8=; b=ltootVx5ODo4SMwvXH6njmDioUVtX9MKN+CsW6hIBBRNG1YD0gP624gchy/1s7BOTyAaejjJlDpD7v5aJ+JY7MrPr2VUi+ekBR3dOQlktQjAt+/29VMV0xHalYyXPZoXLFjUV/t5Y6WLUCayGO1aU3Hj4v/7mMy6Zc+Frxsm29zNKcBA3uDVGfafzqCrExJ3iKO4NGLZFu1gNpT3/NX8aDMa9mOKahRtZ6Kc7nfiFhgevVi7tTK3Nsc3MUjpJZ0bx68TPyuQm+ws2p7c1P4T6pN7+qjiyZ7//sd4BjcwtpTzQ9ntJQAdQgijVn/N/L/yRDQ6ojmDE4Hq+MgnWohekA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=fAD4IJpp5fcUh/lMt+TAP1yeA1o4RK3Df0m6Qdfh4x8=; b=EqEm8Tc+Oky03rZld8V7A2QWP6Si36Wh1HHfeLzvZEAHP7ExMxkccn6FzSxxUpe+bGJoSBIgtachBMfHxY3WHRD+tiuf1XPy7Ctv4qGPIXsNjO83HtVhjCYuaUcZtC2ne87oRVI9gnDBca2G6it3lFUfrJj2NSEkvpyp7ffRnrE=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM6PR05MB6556.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:12b::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3066.7; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:37 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.018; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:37 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
CC: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Thread-Topic: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Thread-Index: AQHWNOJwCOIfMBUBCUO77S7wc3Q1qKi9aJAAgAGl+ICAAAkPAA==
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:37 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB6348501B266FF51DD805C25DAE8F0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAO42Z2xDygUXTGwVunGSTMkZGMF8VePrPaXLSAJg14vAJdca5A@mail.gmail.com> <6DB604C0-2C29-44A8-AB01-DA697552C7DA@employees.org> <1C1F0496-33A8-4646-B356-369EA9ABAD33@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C1F0496-33A8-4646-B356-369EA9ABAD33@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-29T13:58:42Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=0de54ad8-a84c-4187-b845-4b019d678bf5; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.4.0.45
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6ddcf442-9db5-4408-0b99-08d803d862c7
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB6556:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB6556F013491DF3F078C26691AE8F0@DM6PR05MB6556.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 04180B6720
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: BZhL5Hahq6D1HxwJiByu5mj7on+iMh0XCCuJvr2WgRZqxS30CwsRlKPKoW7WS5boZi3WaWbxSmDJmHvCFe6UVkxqqN2PAU/rRSvFRyTrjaPiwNwaelim6Ryg3pCOVLMQojRdpbp6SyIZRrqNRVe717vhXFT0RyOUdCTsH+G/5dYdFzfD5ggcOmLNLxwARQVkoPUKwRluUhVolARb+irYFwKs3FSS98pKOifDEetPneCSaA3NfAO22Dw+A6DL24yMIbeItssFRkKRwqM025hlyniCv2n8YRUBHBi0cLYqqwwtgwWPA1gQbCzU6xME4wtiBwt4LbyCiWldYEd+Z6PbCu8NY/o+RvEGuu6K9e18g5Har2SHHkJLHoVnilAqww5tvxQVxkMUyvnt9VzeRcbu5A==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(26005)(6506007)(53546011)(110136005)(316002)(7696005)(33656002)(2906002)(71200400001)(86362001)(5660300002)(9686003)(8676002)(66946007)(52536014)(66556008)(64756008)(66476007)(66446008)(76116006)(186003)(55016002)(83380400001)(966005)(8936002)(66574014)(4326008)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6ddcf442-9db5-4408-0b99-08d803d862c7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 May 2020 13:58:37.7246 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: CnCp2k/uqF/eeVc9abtTUciHcHSw6wj+bUQq1d28ll1wn8COEyQX9IJ0nwvQ51tmWQ0Sw0EGqEgxEF04eM28Qg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB6556
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-05-29_07:2020-05-28, 2020-05-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=984 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005290110
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/UvtajuHO5fzM3cjbf87ZdGS1TEg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:43 -0000

Stewart,

Generally speaking, the market understands its requirement better than the IETF. Why not let both proceed? 

The market understands its requirements and it will choose wisely.

                                                                               Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 9:22 AM
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


In the past when such issues have arisen a special session has been called at IETF to work out a way forward.

I am not sure how well this would work in a virtual meeting, but it would seem to be an appropriate solution here.

Normal outcomes are pick A, pick B or let both go forward and let the market decide. Although the IETF generally dislikes it, sometimes the later is the only way to get out of the corner.

There are various ways of adopting the third option such as setting one text as informational.

- Stewart



> On 28 May 2020, at 13:11, otroan@employees.org wrote:
>
> Segment Routing (CRH, SRH and friends) isn't something 6man has traditionally dealt with.
> We have been more concerned about IPv6 in the open Internet, end to end, and not so much of technologies only applicable within a controlled domain.
>
> From that perspective, it is not surprising that this work attracts a different participant-set than before.
>
> It seems that a proxy war is being fought out in the working group.
> With both opponents and proponents of proposals closely aligned along company borders.
>
> Best regards,
> Ole, with the dystopian hat on.
>
>
>> On 28 May 2020, at 13:23, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been an active participant in the ipng, 6man and v6ops IETF working groups since 2002.
>>
>> While I've only been to one IETF meeting in person since then (106, sponsored by the Internet Society), over that time I've come to recognise the names of many of the regular and active participants in these IPv6 working groups.
>>
>> I do not recognise many of the names of people who are objecting to the 6man working group adopting the CRH draft.
>>
>> Those who have been active 6man participants in recent years would know that even an ID adopted by 6man, written by Bob and Brian, that had a number of revisions, didn't survive WG last call, and that occurred while Bob was (as he still is) one of the 6man WG chairs.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!V1-LQ6p9QKqjeldG4s-lSwAr7iyRJN13wDX9K_q5nuOotWe2pPMTG87pandUTgzj$
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!V1-LQ6p9QKqjeldG4s-lSwAr7iyRJN13wDX9K_q5nuOotWe2pPMTG87pandUTgzj$
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!V1-LQ6p9QKqjeldG4s-lSwAr7iyRJN13wDX9K_q5nuOotWe2pPMTG87pandUTgzj$
--------------------------------------------------------------------