RE: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security

"Stark, Barbara" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 06 November 2009 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFB33A6831; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKXklgcBcdvZ; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425EB3A6824; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:55:59 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: bs7652@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1257533770!35490735!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.146]
Received: (qmail 16915 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 18:56:12 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.146) by server-3.tower-121.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 18:56:12 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA6Iu96B031515; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:56:09 -0500
Received: from 01GAF5142010621.AD.BLS.COM (01GAF5142010621.ad.bls.com [139.76.131.79]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id nA6ItmWV031345; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:56:04 -0500
Received: from 01NC27689010627.AD.BLS.COM ([90.144.44.202]) by 01GAF5142010621.AD.BLS.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:56:03 -0500
Received: from 01NC27689010641.AD.BLS.COM ([90.144.44.103]) by 01NC27689010627.AD.BLS.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:56:04 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500
Message-ID: <7582BC68E4994F4ABF0BD4723975C3FA10C3768C@crexc41p>
In-Reply-To: <B52C3C2B-924A-4454-B863-57B02F54E5D4@apple.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
thread-index: AcpfDjizWgSln0R8SgCVASZyKw59NAABGP2g
References: <AFC1ACFB-FDFA-482C-AAF9-7995F5CEFE1F@broadband-forum.org><F311A255-3303-4C9D-B270-D1D23DE31E31@cisco.com><200911061358.nA6DwXNq025458@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <B52C3C2B-924A-4454-B863-57B02F54E5D4@apple.com>
From: "Stark, Barbara" <bs7652@att.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2009 18:56:04.0213 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA557A50:01CA5F12]
Cc: 6man-ads@tools.ietf.org, SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>, savi-ads@tools.ietf.org, v6ops-ads@tools.ietf.org, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:56:00 -0000

The liaison was posted in March 2009. It can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file621.doc

Yes, this is very much about dealing with potential duplicate link local
addresses.
Thanks,
Barbara

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> james woodyatt
> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 1:23 PM
> To: Thomas Narten
> Cc: 6man-ads@tools.ietf.org; SAVI Mailing List; savi-
> ads@tools.ietf.org; v6ops-ads@tools.ietf.org; IPv6 Operations; IETF
> IPv6 Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
> 
> On Nov 6, 2009, at 05:58, Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
> > Is there a problem statement somewhere that describes the actual
> > problem for which a solution is needed?
> > Has this been put into an ID, for instance?
> > I haven't been able to get my head around the actual problem from
> > the (few) emails I've seen.
> 
> The letter from the Broadband Forum Technical Chair in the message
> that originated this thread mentions an attachment that includes a
> revised Problem Statement on Duplicate Link Local Addresses, but it
> wasn't forwarded with the letter.
> 
> I'd like to read that problem statement.  Where is it?
> 
> 
> --
> james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
> member of technical staff, communications engineering
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

*****

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. GA621