Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Sat, 11 February 2017 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB931295E8; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:03:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voh7ETHOUTfq; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39852129522; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EDA3A1F335; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:03:00 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAiCKdqRhTPD; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:03:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.101.3.168] (ec2-52-55-200-77.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.55.200.77]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 934B93A1F322; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:02:58 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5333378B-0F8D-4966-82B2-DFF9639CEC7D@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:02:56 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9937846C-5057-427B-AA69-A2F2754DA6EE@sobco.com>
References: <148599296506.18647.12389618334616420462.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <30725d25-9829-bf50-23c6-9e1b757e5cba@si6networks.com> <7ee506c2-4213-9396-186a-2b742c32f93b@gmail.com> <EA7E5B60-F136-47C6-949C-D123FB8DA70E@cisco.com> <00af01d27e11$fe539500$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <60F01869-8B32-46D3-80B1-A140DF1DDA8A@employees.org> <8D401C5B-C3C3-4378-9DFA-BF4ACC8E9DAF@qti.qualcomm.com> <D2D907D5-84B4-43BB-9103-F87DA9F122EB@employees.org> <33DC7B74-D240-4FF2-A8FF-C9C5A66809EE@qti.qualcomm.com> <1179DE45-3971-44A1-9630-28F76D2D652D@employees.org> <2ea64b3c-d69d-6b6c-cb04-fe63727a8bee@si6networks.com> <23C46409-337C-468D-BCDC-34027BB56CAD@employees.org> <30715b9e-e9b7-320e-f9e2-fc3f64615d5c@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqcKu1XVQOPzcd+8b68WcQyjH9QmszaSvKWhT8SvHJ0ppg@mail.gmail.com> <m2y3xdpmjd.wl-randy@psg.com> <5333378B-0F8D-4966-82B2-DFF9639CEC7D@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/T_DnI0XtjbbJoRZ1b1WTCMH04ak>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, =?utf-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis@tools.ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 02:03:04 -0000

kinda a cynical view

Scott

> On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:12 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> excuse?  this is why we have ietf last call.
> 
> No, we do not have IETF last call so that people who participated in the working group discussion can re-litigate the points they lost on in the working group discussion.
>