Re: [IPv6] RFC 6724 shouldn't prefer partial reachability over reachability

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 21 November 2023 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FD1C151981 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:21:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lNIXqhFvUJWS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1134.google.com (mail-yw1-x1134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F922C15155B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1134.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5cb4b4889e5so16738597b3.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:21:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1700594511; x=1701199311; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5Qg6/h70kKNUksF1FNgkAve1uRr1cyYAAYKQzw5QAkE=; b=tN2K+NKdmrd2FzT4iAdYUOR7rr6DQy/qJ3QqNhqoWnOiXD6bgoEPaHFJsHNa474TnW jBiE++I5kKDtKgqH/rx6v/raN9am1Bh0SRvL1ie4xwJLmYjaYWj6S0rCO97v5bX8zZZQ 9wUK9xkX+KgrxLc52uraLTFOEqVxc6QQMmPhYfaiu7v6E/8rfjctcQL/4Syvi3hdbZT7 iUL8blE3NIp1w0VwZh5BmxARWTM9DTE407J88YY++Wb4bpbZvI9K5NRhWgKJYUi9u6OV Tq7hwXHtkv6DtEfL8vA8ouOtnmLYKbAUW+ky27aj34hfKiHVjIisOG4CMOVQn4JROAUv /shA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700594511; x=1701199311; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5Qg6/h70kKNUksF1FNgkAve1uRr1cyYAAYKQzw5QAkE=; b=K2j85TJ+ZHRF6CR51x5RybHOPmjBFzolPe/fjEw6cv4N9+IB4FFPO0N14E+dF5FPLn rHY3x532Nh1k9uUTb7DyfirG5w+zdM24hSbkT4a2UBLTasUJ947zWdIVzLuM+uhZ3NDQ 7LIgmhOV1zfU0In8PvPNrKZ11hxbxVuBlYIF7pV8m4gytf4o3LWOj4Z4HgtvKTZg1IGh LuO7uctufQZBnEHect/E6grWo3pCGv6MjOunKGG4oll5apMTU0Hf1iTnUHbbKP6RDA3I qXlGJtjBZTpJ5xsaTFZMNm8060gEwOTeZO9AtJiwPjlG0enAKo5YBkY+eaIpvjBCdrgO AoMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxg/AaH/4WNlFt0lOlq0uki0UbunRKD/GEcLRHwVVF65E5TPpgM c/6k9XCQo5SoVGCSqFIqaiDKsquPMM0GNuf/o2txfrKedDEVyPsYnq4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGGnZuwUMRtX4kv3aCsgPMR43F83VTUy7dNF45YhgrTmubRhPk41VgUPM+3ylXVoqGKUWN7wfkTusSTQ+rVPw0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:884:b0:5ca:e8a:adb1 with SMTP id cd4-20020a05690c088400b005ca0e8aadb1mr8717754ywb.1.1700594510736; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:21:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPt1N1mXJ6tdvEG9EsTDYxpPHTR3FH74Hp7nUnjQM8j2T3pPcg@mail.gmail.com> <36E7983C-B8C4-4945-BF70-73B196AF9841@employees.org> <CAJU8_nV2QoGjZoegcUSXELqgeqW6OheTt32qq6YQ5XV0g5MPQw@mail.gmail.com> <CACMsEX9dMLiphu4qapz08vNpbQgcfX+EWtQUZkgb_wtBWvKGVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACMsEX9dMLiphu4qapz08vNpbQgcfX+EWtQUZkgb_wtBWvKGVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:21:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=v+bn6qy6PuH_08hB_X87o2T6JV2r4QKvqhCU6riiqjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Kyle Rose <krose=40krose.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Ole Trøan <otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b8456f060aae833f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/U6ZoI5_UL1f8rlTJYFdOWOXatHE>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] RFC 6724 shouldn't prefer partial reachability over reachability
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:21:52 -0000

Op di 21 nov 2023 om 14:05 schreef Nick Buraglio <
buraglio@forwardingplane.net>

> I tend to look at the end states like most people, but real change happens
> in small bits over time. If this gets us *incrementally* closer to a more
> predictable routing stack while also providing some much needed tweaks to
> make that transition more predictable (which is the real goal of this
> particular endeavor), it is worth the effort.
>

Thanks. This is very well put.

>