RFC 6547 on RFC 3627 to Historic Status
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 29 February 2012 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1858F21F86BD; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:19:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4XKjvNGdXkg; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05BE21F86B1; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8F58C72E114; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:59:21 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 6547 on RFC 3627 to Historic Status
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20120229185925.8F58C72E114@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:59:21 -0800
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:19:55 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6547
Title: RFC 3627 to Historic Status
Author: W. George
Status: Informational
Stream: IETF
Date: February 2012
Mailbox: wesley.george@twcable.com
Pages: 3
Characters: 4917
Obsoletes: RFC3627
Updates: RFC6164
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-01.txt
URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6547.txt
This document moves "Use of /127 Prefix Length Between Routers
Considered Harmful" (RFC 3627) to Historic status to reflect the
updated guidance contained in "Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-
Router Links" (RFC 6164). A Standards Track document supersedes an
informational document; therefore, guidance provided in RFC 6164 is
to be followed when the two documents are in conflict. This document
links the two RFCs so that the IETF's updated guidance on this topic
is clearer. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
- RFC 6547 on RFC 3627 to Historic Status rfc-editor