Re: 64share v2

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 10/11/2020 à 17:06, [e-mail] a écrit :
>> So we add a bit (as the earlier proposal did) to make clear that the intent in this case is to make the prefix available to the recipient. Over this pt-to-pt link.
> 
> Yes, or rather a new option. And text about the lifetime of the delegated prefix being decoupled of the link state.
> 
> Here is the required CDDL for the universal configuration option.
> 
> delegated-prefix = {
>      prefix : tstr
>      lifetime : uint
> }
> 
> And when I get really good at CDDL I can add prefix length range restriction to [0-64].

If I knew CDDL I would propose a relationship between parameters that 
enforces that the prefix length plus IID length to make for 128.

RA might put a prefix of length 56 in there but the underlying 
link-layer protocol negotiates the IID.  That is currently a 64bit IID. 
  The sum does not make for 128.

Or maybe we dont want SLAAC to be the one who forms an address on the 
3GPP interface of a mobile device?

Alex

> 
> Ole
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>