Fwd: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO value 3

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> Wed, 14 May 2008 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipv6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CB23A69D9; Wed, 14 May 2008 09:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324073A6A09 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 May 2008 09:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.176
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.577, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16JSNlXSmWLZ for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 May 2008 09:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-fb01.nokia.com (mgw-fb01.nokia.com [192.100.122.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75723A6933 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2008 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134]) by mgw-fb01.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m4EG00lL029308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2008 19:00:03 +0300
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m4EFsdxX014655; Wed, 14 May 2008 10:54:55 -0500
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 May 2008 18:54:39 +0300
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 May 2008 18:54:39 +0300
Received: from es-nira-64-48.europe.nokia.com (es-nira-64-48.europe.nokia.com [10.162.64.48]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id m4EFsabh031616; Wed, 14 May 2008 18:54:37 +0300
Message-Id: <913678E6-D723-419B-B19D-7430D9DF4641@nokia.com>
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Fwd: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO value 3
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:54:35 +0200
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805141642001.28722@sbz-31.cs.Helsinki.FI>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2008 15:54:39.0157 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0DAFE50:01C8B5DA]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

FYI

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Jukka MJ Manner" <jmanner@cs.Helsinki.FI>
> Date: May 14, 2008 3:51:08 PM GMT+02:00
> To: Transport Area WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org 
> >
> Subject: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO  
> value 3
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and
> allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations.
>
> There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP:
> "1" Datagram contains RSVP message 	[RFC2711]
> "3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0		[RFC3175]
>
> We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from  
> use, and
> reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1"  
> should be
> used to indicate end-to-end RSVP.
>
> The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would  
> this
> change break something?
>
> Regards,
> Jukka
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------