IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Formal Anycast Addresses and Functional Anycast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-form-func-anycast-addresses-01.txt)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 04 November 2019 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12713120019 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:38:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lp0nJMLxMXhA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D566120044 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310413818F for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:35:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4424560 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:38:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Formal Anycast Addresses and Functional Anycast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-form-func-anycast-addresses-01.txt)
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2zbPVAK=4-JBb10A-2yDB9N+0xu70DHtUNp5JUsjuagrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <157277906705.13535.345852921709779212.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAO42Z2wSU-puDaQq-PzTCTE=S3qyqUNrPhH0pgOEO_d3=StnHA@mail.gmail.com> <b97c15c0-b1fe-0d78-0897-5fc4bb6a9a34@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2xwDexwFaEzCNRYrHTAPRFTuLNGOu=K24xiGmyGCqfv8A@mail.gmail.com> <28d3a5c8-c908-a89f-b6f6-8b0be4bc565f@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2zbPVAK=4-JBb10A-2yDB9N+0xu70DHtUNp5JUsjuagrA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:38:38 -0500
Message-ID: <28524.1572892718@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/UXnWvCtbVHt8a74W40Qbqkmu-UY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:38:43 -0000

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
    > One way to increase the relative advantage of IPv6 over IPv4 is to
    > provide useful capabilities in IPv6 that are not, cannot be provided
    > or cannot be provided easily in IPv4. I assume you support increased
    > IPv6 adoption since you're here.

    > A formal IPv6 anycast address class, providing improvements over
    > IPv4's and IPv6's informal anycast addresses, can increase the
    > relative advantage of IPv6.

+1

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email