IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 21 April 2017 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46931296D2; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GB3dkOebgHs9; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22d.google.com (mail-io0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E382129B33; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id a103so133136535ioj.1; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=DnroOFQXX/BSJVaaDZTBYos6WstPRPOf2PwgkopesiQ=; b=hvmhQwCt8I+IR8HHyj4Mavm3m3c4md1HqnyqCVLpufSfAxelkfVES/9j5OgP1S1H4j xmMl+hcTtdC/6KYqqs19imv77vMZ4S9cMqWPzpb2LiAU0TNxB1ZNgiKMHTfo4V09cExW R/dmejWtCoriwZLNmXTI/r9FMrqGTSD9hA3xxLknzVmNoq/5OjrpdDfV1ky7v9oNiV7e e3W3ztbYkbiZnX2RW5xukp1EdP+N6f63x5QcfYQYSYWNDPwOYOuE9FIOjwqQA5JYy9z8 Nr/44YdZLfF8vOMbDK9qS8LuS9z1fqhMoVFVulXgkXDwlBoUZAnbZcCv7uuNCc//SQiy oQlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DnroOFQXX/BSJVaaDZTBYos6WstPRPOf2PwgkopesiQ=; b=FRDq3fwIlvyQoyY93/VEIkMsEWOtNAB3/KfLVSrS5edrhnpDsCrF7j1uPtZAPuRm4k YH8+VlxXivxP2jLx3EtV/u5+6UaZhY4STH2YV11/OptV7gWe+fCGs5qZNvoyt+wFIaMz n8w/auyyXqjsRsg7FALcDLScXazWFHk09tDYfvGW9nobEX7O3yQwwn1nky991hf2T/Ug di9BXV0Pku4mNMzByYAr5RV4X/Y/iaOOGFmsVZszrbrFXYdYM9gCm8Dc7yEhRvxSY2SZ WnD4BEpEaUc9c8f3vI5Bpbg9sSHLQJGYvziDNwzk/Z42R4DIuRqqRa3VDFBFDLbYWlpr WXVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/70onQTyNUm/Yot/BadP70b2XK0Ipzrv5Szw+ySjyvLjs8i4rjw AVvi5YnRZp4DqSToqQcbPxBVA8aH8w==
X-Received: by 10.107.33.135 with SMTP id h129mr18857405ioh.57.1492805375102; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.170.4 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E2595B09-575D-49AE-92B2-0064B82772F9@employees.org>
References: <149201127005.15808.3277140025315157500.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <248F8BA5-48D6-4933-B45F-7F1B20477C2C@employees.org> <3C06A5F9-19B9-48E1-BB67-57D540E5E38D@kuehlewind.net> <A5628A89-3830-4851-87F1-AE8329597DAE@gmail.com> <58B249A0-2F0B-4AD6-890D-BB0F0594DEE1@kuehlewind.net> <0c7d3a7b-99c9-dbef-d6cc-9a4a94cb9c9f@gmail.com> <4AE56E75-78D4-43EA-8118-8195FD8A3D08@kuehlewind.net> <4fc2ef36-cd17-58f1-8089-a5645f08ad45@gmail.com> <D7EE44C3-04DB-4CFD-836F-2BFA74A35268@employees.org> <90DFC565-B4E7-45E2-BE6A-0B67895E87F8@gmail.com> <CA+MHpBr7aeuyd8h5n6U6Q4jD_gtLCKsPJUgQqQuhgkEE3DGwqg@mail.gmail.com> <D41A10C3-74D4-45EE-8161-C344CB30329A@kuehlewind.net> <5E28EF66-7BE1-4F11-88F3-6D928870A9FE@kuehlewind.net> <616cb74d-cc15-6c26-cb1d-612dfcddd353@gmail.com> <99E119A3-4BEA-4EE4-9DC1-7B434CAAE016@kuehlewind.net> <8EF4BCDA-ADB9-4EF4-A873-95CA67C6D7F3@employees.org> <8d127de1-a1b6-8406-c234-192fcbf01ad4@si6networks.com> <65C701D2-A0FF-40E5-B88D-E2E9C7260E02@gmail.com> <f7c19564-ea23-dac4-920c-d05a3c7d0cd9@si6networks.com> <CA+b+ERkHjv=w8g1R4LDVB-+kD=dVCVgtVu_D53oAqkOPFAzDkQ@mail.gmail.com> <E2595B09-575D-49AE-92B2-0064B82772F9@employees.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:09:33 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: J42UtezWmFxyC1tSukN8pKmHNac
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkPYQMJdUdyW+69MXLy6kVn_d==8iZ9mSF5hSCVtyb6aw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: otroan@employees.org
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis@ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f5e81a17dd054db2d60a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Us75NrxVOLk6WR_s4YR1kSdduSI>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:09:52 -0000

​Hi Ole,​


> That does in no way stop anyone from proposing _new_ work. Of any sort.
>
> Best regards,
> Ole
>

​Very true ! Anyone can propose anything in IETF.

But with the text additions which I have seen here recently the bar to move
from individual's draft proposal to WG doc then via all LCs to Standards
Track RFC just went up significantly higher especially for SRH and EH
elements. ​

And that's my point.

Cheers,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email