IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt>

"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123E212D963 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LRBtsR4aIb8P for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D9F12D95A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5746; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1524516880; x=1525726480; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=0FQdNjGuuxH3fbeE9+QN/JEmmEudEUnca4BGVlKvUAE=; b=W8dqiJP4Dbd8AQv+/+yTYxr3G4mZEhr5RfyMDwFtf8TbjMyOb+gWwBlN A8WMULBzi0a3I5tW+1FNhwcHJ2s8VkotrBdSaYNC6OE0lMX/ZPOzWSRaJ /P+fDjqTN7sJcbQn3DVo11PdjpEz4T3Yttn/qcgBHEu+YY4c0zgR4sgOt U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BNCwBmR95a/5ldJa1dHAEBAQQBAQoBAYJNdmEXYygKmFqBUyGBD4ZshyaEboF4CyOESAKCZyE1FwECAQEBAQEBAmwcDIUjAQQBHVwFCwIBCA4xByERFBECBA4FhCtMAw0ID6p5hw0NgSuCORSHeIFUP4EyDIJcgk9CAoFQToJygiQCkGiGXywIAoVahWeCfYE0g12HPYk2QIYQAhETAYEkAR4BNSaBLHAVOyoBghgJiwdghF5vj0YBgRcBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,319,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="167694559"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2018 20:54:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (xch-rcd-020.cisco.com [173.37.102.30]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3NKsd2w003570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:54:40 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:54:39 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:54:39 -0500
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com>
CC: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "cf(mailer list)" <cf@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt>
Thread-Topic: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHT20VLGP3vF8CmjUisTfGR9LIe7A==
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:54:39 +0000
Message-ID: <4C26F642-0E99-4540-8518-26538BBB83D9@cisco.com>
References: <CAEQxF6WeiLOoyq2g=_Ff2jyvLO_WHUof2pdxCLP7XzcAs4QDuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEQxF6WeiLOoyq2g=_Ff2jyvLO_WHUof2pdxCLP7XzcAs4QDuA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.77]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4C26F6420E994540851826538BBB83D9ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/V6S6IZiZtwzFUUlunO_dTwhLgdU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:54:43 -0000

Hi Kentaro, thanks for your comments on rev11 of the draft. I updated the definition and description in section 3.2.  I believe that closes this issue being tracked:
#65<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/6man/ticket/65>

Please verify that this is closed with revision12.

Thanks.
  Darren

On Apr 6, 2018, at 2:51 AM, Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com<mailto:ebiken.g@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi,

I have a question about the definition of SL which Ron has pointed out, but from a slightly different standpoint.

Recently there was a new function "T.Encaps.Red" defined in draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-04 which will insert SRH with two segments and SL=2.
> 5.5. T.Encaps.Red: Transit with reduce encaps in an SRv6 Policy
> 1. push an IPv6 header with its own SRH (S3, S2; SL=2)

And in draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11 it's defined as follows.
> "Defined in [RFC8200], it contains the index, in the Segment List, of the next segment to inspect.  Segments Left is decremented at each segment."

But since there are only two segments, SegmentList[0] and [1], in the SRH, there is no such segment with "INDEX=2".

So the definition in RFC8200 seems more clear which defines SL not as an index but as "Number of route segments remaining".

Regards,
--
Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com<mailto:ebiken.g@gmail.com>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email