Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Thu, 31 January 2019 21:26 UTC
Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC11130F6A; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:26:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uz_g_mj8YqBL; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:26:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71349130F2C; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:26:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id u18so4022200oie.10; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:26:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZO9bXTZh4hCy2fr4xlre8MvQjFGVRmIrDi4LR1BN3To=; b=sUdq8E18vwqpQKetl1wBcPUPd8bAiM/pfJdxtZFJHIgd/X49Vn01yJZLsmCUQ9UKpM wZ29eoUnP63rYKEZJv9OLv3oYfuPzIwwYKMzvDeNbZhfmXqWEIHrTfXFqGJMp9XYw7fS Ww7ZwkZlM58lIh8iKvg6s18CWvPlVsRlyllLteVMpT4e034+lt8InzMSrN52Qf1J7Krc JaRZ4UT7Vdggplx16SK04HgsIs93fRmZVnUcFBZiMWWd03rtT25j7EjJnnN906uAClzH Cb9e1xlifH1BEIVhwcYSyOxmfrfV5nNagM0yFWxSGExoaHcG0EC9wKUt1RK690GNAOea 8egg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZO9bXTZh4hCy2fr4xlre8MvQjFGVRmIrDi4LR1BN3To=; b=aQRO3JGvqF+19cpfQkHHnlFAlFXjZ0GZbda5TJHQ4PDGbsO+KpjU4G3Mqzo6MJY4MI uPAAdy+iow4ELyclbgROEVHYcTuDAHwuYP32JHa+2Tfg7pH5P7VyjFX2k/IZLNcqLR3V JG6K3JgoA2w5/wuJb8GSnL1ihXpd9KyhsAFutVN9YmwO5CQYvct+yhbbCbK1buow6LBG AdB4Lrb+XZysONCj9eQ8aeMavNLBupPBA62rOwA+XqP4mcaRlQEfP24+bH9h2ccGNeKK WFsghiAgjf3/MyJZ6lKaRi4M+bixCHocuGReibP7cL1SSZLvmvgihww5ZNZHQNlsWXJP tfwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcVdJOnspzIMFSQG6/fg1yRZsKU3ZTD1tAzIszXoykgYqbO+PQQ qtKjvbTCgNiEwh5i4x//95NXogbK6Z8qWMCthR3hMiJB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN48MyvYK6pqtOlntg98Rsgqdr6cP1ixift7H5bBp2iM0Kr8awA40gcHyU44xjgK8vnbl9inILw4sRLpLkvoyV4=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5a88:: with SMTP id o130mr17107417oib.275.1548969997342; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:26:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60fabe4b-fd76-4b35-08d3-09adce43dd71@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <60fabe4b-fd76-4b35-08d3-09adce43dd71@si6networks.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 08:26:10 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xp5sBMfDP3z2SX9roomo_uGTAWLfTqBeQESS5pnkoqBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/VU4VRrxB3QfHkuexGpZmzZF6G0g>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:26:42 -0000
Hi, So I thought about this problem back when I was doing some work with IPv6 CPE vendors and working on a production IPv6 residential deployment in 2010. As the CPE vendors were commonly using 'radvd', I thought it would be easier for me to write some code for that to handle this situation and push it directly to the 'radvd' people rather than try to go through the vendors and have them up stream it. Here's the descriptions of the two options that were added for a prefix (from radvd.conf(5)) DeprecatePrefix on|off Upon shutdown, this option will cause radvd to deprecate the prefix by announcing it in the radvd shutdown RA with a zero preferred lifetime and a valid lifetime slightly greater than 2 hours. This will encourage end-nodes using this prefix to depre‐ cate any associated addresses immediately. Note that this option should only be used when only one router is announcing the pre‐ fix onto the link, otherwise end-nodes will deprecate associated addresses despite the prefix still being valid for preferred use. See RFC4862, section 5.5.3., "Router Advertisement Processing", part (e). Default: off DecrementLifetimes on|off This option causes radvd to decrement the values of the pre‐ ferred and valid lifetimes for the prefix over time. The life‐ times are decremented by the number of seconds since the last RA. If radvd receives a SIGUSR1 signal, it will reset the values of the preferred and valid lifetimes back to the initial values used by radvd when it started. If radvd never receives a SIGUSR1 signal, it will continue to decrement the lifetimes until the preferred lifetime reaches zero. After a final RA with a zero value preferred lifetime, radvd will cease to announce the pre‐ fix. If a SIGUSR1 signal then causes the lifetimes to be reset, the prefix will then re-appear in the RAs. This option is intended to be used in conjunction with a DHCPv6 client that is using the Identity Association for Prefix Delega‐ tion (IA_PD) option to acquire a prefix from a Delegating Router for use by a Requesting Router. In this scenario, the prefix(es) from within the delegated prefix that are announced by radvd would age in parallel with and at the same rate as the delegated prefix, and expire at approximately the same time, if the dele‐ gated prefix's life isn't extended. See RFC3633, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6". Default: off As mentioned in the first option description, to deprecate an address/prefix, a RA PIO valid lifetime of zero is invalid, and must be greater than 7200 seconds / 2 hours. This is to prevent a DoS by a rogue RA announcing a 0 valid lifetime. RFC4862, section 5.5.3., "Router Advertisement Processing", part (e) discusses this. I chose the value 7203 seconds. The second option is to ensure synchronised ageing of addresses on hosts in parallel with the age of the DHCPv6-PD prefix. In case of a CPE reboot, if the CPE gets a different new prefix via DHCPv6-PD, the new prefix's lifetimes will probably be greater than those of the old DHCPv6-PD prefix, and if I recall correctly, I was seeing hosts choose to use the highest preferred lifetime addresses. So the addresses from the newer PD prefix should be used by hosts, and the addresses from the old and now invalid one should eventually age out and disappear. I've recently thought there was something in the source address selection RFC about choosing highest value lifetimes in source address selection, however I can't seem to find it, so I may be misremembering. This second option isn't perfect though, as it won't work if the newer PD prefix has lower initial lifetimes than the current lifetimes of the old prefix at the time CPE reboots. That could happen if an ISP has decided to roll out lower PD prefix lifetimes. More broadly, a router reboot is or should be a transient packet loss event. Hosts are expected to tolerate transient packet loss, which is why TCP didn't originally have any keepalives at all, and the keepalives it commonly has now has a large initial timeout value of 2 hours. Devices (well, routers) in the Internet aren't intended to have knowledge of transport layer connections, so that if they reboot they don't have to reacquire or relearn transport layer connection state before being able to forward hosts' packets. IPv4/IPv6 forwarding is purposely stateless. So if a CPE reboots and reattaches to the network/Internet at the same point, it should be given back the same DHCPv6-PD prefix i.e. the stable prefix scenario. If the CPE reattaches to the network at a different point (for some definition of different attachment point e.g. different access link, different PPPoE username), then giving it a different PD prefix is reasonable and probably should be expected. I sympathise with the privacy issue of the stable prefix. I think it would be better to have the end-user initiate a PD prefix change via a web portal or similar, rather than rebooting their CPE, because it isn't possible for an ISP to distinguish whether a CPE reboot was caused by a bug or the end-user was actively doing it for the purposes of changing the PD prefix, so it isn't possible to absolutely know if the same or a different PD prefix should be given back to the CPE. If an ISP wants to or needs to initiate the prefix changes, they could have a mechanism to cycle customers through old and new DHCPv6-PD prefixes, phasing them in and out over time using IPv6 address ageing. I don't think that would be a very simple mechanism to build, however there is the cost of providing prefix privacy over time. (One issue might be that some customers have connections they want to have up for long periods of time e.g. a CCTV video feed, longer than the ISP chosen default prefix lifetime for privacy. Those customers should probably given a option somewhere to opt out of the changing prefixes, or to be able to set their own privacy prefix change interval.) Note that the ISP I worked for in 2010 provided (an still provides) stable PD prefixes (and dynamic SLAAC ones on the PPPoE/PPP session), so the ability to cope with changing PD prefixes upon CPE reboot wasn't a capability we required. I mainly spent my own time on the problem and the 'radvd' code. I think that's all of what I thought about this at the time, I'll see if I can remember anything else. Regards, Mark. On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 22:01, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > We have posted a new I-D discussing a problem that can arise in typical > deployment scenarios where the CPE obtains a prefix via DHCPv6-PD and > advertises a prefix on the LAN side. > > Our draft is available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum > > > The Abstract is: > A very common IPv6 deployment scenario is that in which a CPE employs > DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation to obtain an IPv6 prefix, and at least one > prefix from within the leased prefix is advertised on a local network > via SLAAC. In scenarios where e.g. the CPE crashes and reboots, > nodes on the local network continue using outdated prefixes which > result in connectivity problems. This document analyzes this problem > scenario, and proposes workarounds. > > Any comments will be welcome. > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
- A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scen… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Sander Steffann
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fred Baker
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Christian Huitema
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Christian Huitema
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Andrews
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Christian Huitema
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tore Anderson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Christian Huitema
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Jan Zorz - Go6
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Christian Huitema
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Christian Huitema
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: privacy at layer 7 and above (was: A common p… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Christian Huitema
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Markku Savela
- Re: privacy at layer 7 and above Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: privacy at layer 7 and above Simon Hobson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Simon Hobson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Sander Steffann
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Simon Hobson
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Tom Herbert
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Tom Herbert
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Tom Herbert
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jen Linkova
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jen Linkova
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Sander Steffann
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Philip Homburg
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Tim Chown
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lee Howard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- RE: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Tom Herbert
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- 6renum alive again? [A common problem with SLAAC … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: 6renum alive again? [A common problem with SL… Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: 6renum , NEMO, and others, alive again? [A co… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Ole Troan
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jen Linkova
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Sander Steffann
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Jen Linkova
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Mark Smith
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… sthaug
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- graceful renumbering of CPE networks Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Michael Richardson
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Nick Hilliard
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … j h woodyatt
- Re: 6renum alive again? [A common problem with SL… 神明達哉
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Fernando Gont
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: 6renum alive again? [A common problem with SL… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… j h woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Erik Kline
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … j h woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tim Chown
- Re: 6renum alive again? [A common problem with SL… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Philip Homburg
- Re: 6renum alive again? [A common problem with SL… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Timothy Winters
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Gert Doering
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- NAT debate (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLA… Fernando Gont
- Re: NAT debate (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Kristian McColm
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Kristian McColm
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Raymond Burkholder
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Kristian McColm
- Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving mu… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Christian Huitema
- Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Nick Hilliard
- Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A commo… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Christian Huitema
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Owen DeLong
- Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A c… Michael Richardson
- Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achievin… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Timothy Winters
- Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A c… David Farmer
- Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achievin… Ca By
- Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A c… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Lee Howard
- Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achievin… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achievin… Michael Richardson
- Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A c… David Farmer
- Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A c… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Owen DeLong
- Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achievin… Ca By
- Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achievin… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Jan Zorz - Go6
- Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A c… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ted Lemon
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Michael Richardson
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Sander Steffann
- RE: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Michael Richardson
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really … Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… 神明達哉
- RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… 神明達哉
- there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common pro… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Erik Kline
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Mark Smith
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Philip Homburg
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… 神明達哉
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Tim Chown
- Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networks Michael Richardson
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… 神明達哉
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Philip Homburg
- Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… Timothy Winters
- RE: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renum… Philip Homburg