Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sun, 02 February 2020 08:53 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D12D120856 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 00:53:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dm31ZN84ZVrT for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 00:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC1412006F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 00:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id r16so10816647otd.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 00:53:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QQSnYMczr8F64Xk9EfLetzJjDMsg4068CZo/Os/O9bA=; b=X4L1ZPaLD4QjO+H2O4BpMvCciqBNcrobFoGi9JGYAKmRtMSizfhOX1Sh50Zu06/c04 rH1ISGoHj30E4W1TV0qAduvhomGooQEGfye3G4k8a9OCRCDBrsFIrVEdrtkYEeelm9pP r5L1qdPot/pqCRsxSjdVVNWKGcGfJ5lsZ7afvWHT61q2kb7EvX3JjHLU1Tm8lnxxhxyS hw3SY4AwEMP0DltMhpG6hFJiV5DS90Lkt3YpGo8Zr/0qghL3vVQpLMZQiq8Hqag0OovP VebqN+NUYS1xOhpW5V/CHshUdeBKg4O6D1YP+rcei9Bk4vbVMBnCIwARehf+csyuLuq/ bezw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QQSnYMczr8F64Xk9EfLetzJjDMsg4068CZo/Os/O9bA=; b=ePFZc+qFzuNEZLfpBXTo2dVL8uPFbe2/4/i4BG3QtHrg3RBSL6jl/h3Eona6/Gj8+v CejS22ZckUFduZb4A66ufzl3tY0HfUI28y9x/u/wFOIcV7HKtQe3r7wC7KA1CM6e98US mHfiWfu5I1iHJXCGOFWIj0Lasg+eOZqG9sKiQD/AtnzIyjB+E+Y0Eb53os6gRon1y/pq eWF2YOGQ8JC656ssbKfnmVFNSL32Z4WcfTtV4UN9Z8Ueril0Jb2yEZ8NE2g9qFb+ZYVM 4uADhk/gA3lUvj22XmUmJHJ81C5xNaCF22TtLHhd2rmgarX4hCYJeGDea8DHFqPZ73ws aLNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWMKkjJQvMR6bpl+foti9GTFuq/BIl1P0prlqxge0nPUNrDmRmn e5ev3qDcR66XGkO21U898QZvxbBA+fiBsF+QEcc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzxlmQ0R6Nmkr+yUFOdTIY4RLSoCIHG2zSUhzXf2I6kx9/oXDajbzPUEBzO28C89e5Olb4ZnUrJPIPz7oBMdmA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6005:: with SMTP id h5mr14616032otj.153.1580633610470; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 00:53:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV2=TPU+CQ1zBu58DmRD7i3=tBsdZvuOxuaS_jQLZ-ebBw@mail.gmail.com> <2E8EF340-72CD-46BC-A634-22571BC5E705@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <2E8EF340-72CD-46BC-A634-22571BC5E705@puck.nether.net>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 19:53:18 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2we-rJTdou9pR8509J1wS95Hfz67+=ThxKJkEZpTe0H4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000df49e1059d93f045"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/VxGuHGOxUYUcqd7BzTex316iD64>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 08:53:34 -0000

On Sun, 2 Feb 2020, 19:05 Jared Mauch, <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:

> They are also useful and needed when debugging hashing or 802.3ad related
> issues. To debug the flow hash you often need stable addresses which are
> not easily changed


Can you explain how you do this troubleshooting? Do you spoof end users
addresses?


or provided by the average user who just expects the technology to work.


Temporary addresses have been the default on Apple OS X since Lion in 2011
and Windows Vista in 2007. That doesn't seem to have prevented IPv6 working
for the average user.




> Sent from my iCar
>
> > On Feb 1, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Stable random IPv6 address works best to meet the objective of an
> enterprise.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>