IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt - textual representation of prefixes

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Mon, 06 March 2017 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B948912955D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:14:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtMRubDag5le for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx36-42.antispamcloud.com (mx36-42.antispamcloud.com [209.126.121.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52FC012956A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xsmtp02.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.215]) by mx36.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1ckgIT-0001Za-Rn for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:14:42 +0100
Received: from [10.5.2.17] (helo=xmail07.myhosting.com) by xsmtp02.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1ckgIS-0006WS-Cr for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:14:41 -0500
Received: (qmail 28960 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2017 00:14:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.102]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.56.42.251]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail07.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; 6 Mar 2017 00:14:39 -0000
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <20170223134026.GI5069@gir.theapt.org> <37851ee3-03be-8bee-6190-f4d28df86305@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703012051590.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <b5784622-c24e-a531-4e68-249b03701941@gmail.com> <CAAedzxrSTFe0GgYuvtXPNE=R_ZCXotxL7HbKdj5A4-869rncmw@mail.gmail.com> <ba025be6-709d-87b4-f388-d6f143408277@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703021029010.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4e17a9f4-6daf-787f-0321-3327fe601d70@gmail.com> <bead3cd8-f7f9-37b3-66f9-e76ae94056d1@baanhofman.nl> <63d98caf-ab70-088f-ff6b-ad27a11619e0@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcOLSK061p_biSD3GK1y464Ld=8Zp3-hAuJqQ2R2t3JRw@mail.gmail.com> <68803ac3-97f4-838c-ffd2-a294d7fb6d0d@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqc7cFrhCaiGMGeSUf1zMsXpcoDUVvYQ13L-Soe4Rwf6RA@mail.gmail.com> <a630f8b8-e6ed-885a-a909-6c75dfd79892@gmail.com> <49C3F649-FEC9-430E-B716-D5608E00D385@gmail.com> <23d0ed53-918f-dec0-1914-57f2e31bccc9@gmail.com> <401d81b3-f8e5-d38c-826b-167ca6b1f917@gmail.com> <42a4a6df-cc25-765f-b7c7-650601f72670@gmail.com>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <c249b602-38ae-4f2b-a0fe-f2e60d9e81e4@huitema.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 16:14:38 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <42a4a6df-cc25-765f-b7c7-650601f72670@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt - textual representation of prefixes
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.215
X-SpamExperts-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.03)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIVbU93hg6Kq00BjAzYBqWlVTHAar8Je/lORhy3PZJU8LERWeKKG4PAQY Nyavp7c49MJIIgmXWciG0xIgIHG/MnhTugiLDom8V25hond3K4RsO76XSTAwtV4mg4i2ouCDa4AU hvIWAV5xUW/+gAh4vXpzB+mA2qyGiWpshqM7KdLERcOb18WfxGyg6Om6u4YYm487AErZRllNtCvl HaELcsU5hjoyEb9Oq0NWpyO3vrfYKtU04a0dsdHkKEFmS31kUD3dKxLhoxcmaInYbR5vlqGudzLe k2TYFBStSOMccbr5Uz0sPgnpAk2KA2vJwMd1uWhCmLzOxTAcQmFWVARhgNqBNFD3an3wiMp49rVr ybSBkye6uEH7Y2FUSOL4rzI+g3TFgIfDMShmlQFqCr5hA8xAXSGwpLGc/Znuh3MoIpK0rVi/LFcx xQic0uvot497+7bRF0J+AL6gRRwFcty0/RGJ+cv73CChOPjKA0/DVd83mzKXD5o/Ia+BqyQ7Q0nt IZ2PVtMHd8bHCmdzlxzVIEgwyGTHIAoNFX+jcW7DGmdE6eBVl9/A6GtGi+mfMSANmjLzCyMdOETT xDqixVDal2Zqxiuap5uKiBpffUsHYsfmkrboF55pyqAvfOP9PRiFk64VFGHGL6a4Aiv0Hpn+svlW gWWsfzmdEBxk/w4+z2XWHxcEeYXaEh7Ip8nBmIzXZwpqT8auRNlXQctohljUCg+Z9KJloL0zOKsR tQI96RZLKhBaevb8pkwVq3+XN9bPyjRMyLUEno1frs9vZR0iI5iTGneI1cCMIcE6R6jtJ8btb7sy ltanepIHrA9+HqSAzfrQq23LWyXZeC7ahMm5trYQxK4Q6pnz1PG2i0Jcu7De
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/WGzBL5Df50UJLQ6RVceNANUaCTA>
Cc: IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:14:46 -0000

On 3/5/2017 4:39 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>
> I think that %iface should be mandatory in notation of LLs.  Otherwise
> there can be collision. 

Mandatory in what context? The interface ID is only defined in the
context of a machine. %Eth0 on one machine may designate the same link
as %10 on another.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email