IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next steps on Extension Header Insertion

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A95812956A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OBze3lT4B5a0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35BA31296F6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n85so36635174pfi.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJ3B3xy5XO9H7xlnD6sgeSrcpC9WKw2CWOFJ0tpLPfY=; b=SwFEPfC/193DZzbWbin51tE/6vB24V8IHPqeQUfoopn3ITvokdS4pTeIyTpsGEw3Xq of2+cfgL9ZqNrEfUydVW6ZRFX1dvtVTKyrr48VsJmdnveQzL5wuvr2njtYUwRn+EfnlC yN0mjkrEbnVVyYP+UyjbPTmDRIRK8uJdQ0ruEDta8O8p282uG1RiAOX+Dq3BduQQlxXJ tFxfpSaG/NGRixmACY+H14BkmDrHZ5tf9ZUm7mzanhkvU3k+lNml/DxOBoIrISTV98hj QaYPXFh26gSLBHFX1U7tx8J5UKMH6p0RIkWKM6JqpKFF+13WD5z51cgVeA2P9GWeH4KZ 12Iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJ3B3xy5XO9H7xlnD6sgeSrcpC9WKw2CWOFJ0tpLPfY=; b=i0VdzZuHzc2NaYhgOM9KBdMYXIuFCfc7T6HTNzzKGhJ35dOWZB3Uukel21HIqVTwsI kCbIqjFCAvV0XWNNcy+0iruJ8KOtorI1nHke4EUTtVwByMOuZjmA66GBo1Z2Clks3Elz 8Qy3n1mX/PCoSOqeLRKR4uws58+REAvxpfWRYZzYnoUGrVIJYD4ucRKX/Lw30CHwmDkM dKDswir0kWbMwBnCwdmR0nL+E9maTBPh7RUjClBA+xxt56HegqQHixjZyEgA3C0jPkFy uu5Lizqnhlr3gDuN4utIG8zNNtpRUBURzCkZcdiC8mvf0zH8gSkDofUv5KjZEIqKMEC7 /0Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfZiVHMaWZKdWRRbmOTF/Vu7SafxWGvHkEu28U98I9+Ui+1SAj4Vu3vHmtVaumMgw==
X-Received: by 10.98.105.68 with SMTP id e65mr19353065pfc.174.1478201806834; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] ([118.148.73.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm14582700pfd.53.2016.11.03.12.36.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Next steps on Extension Header Insertion
To: otroan@employees.org, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <B291E9E6-A803-423F-BFA5-87A74DCFB784@gmail.com> <dfe00826-1bcd-80ae-e6dc-7763c506cbe4@si6networks.com> <9CA73891-B4FA-47DF-82E1-A4867DBC6A3F@steffann.nl> <3C56AA77-18E4-4254-BB6A-A447CE115392@employees.org> <CAG6TeAtJdUua3saSGz0SX7DW6hwf74yAexpnfYoP1bg6v1eywA@mail.gmail.com> <EF8FE087-C84F-44C0-9769-72106115BDA9@employees.org> <7BB6DFAA-7E32-4E84-AC3D-5B1F89AEBFB9@jisc.ac.uk> <2BF05215-347F-4AFA-B21D-D0F558F58F07@employees.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <2295216c-593a-8610-ddb9-405f2fde2f3f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 08:36:53 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2BF05215-347F-4AFA-B21D-D0F558F58F07@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/WLy1vQHYhHstt95mk4EE-ktJupU>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 19:36:56 -0000

On 03/11/2016 23:30, otroan@employees.org wrote:
...
> Indeed, and since no-one has proposed to do this (in a draft) makes it very fuzzy what we're arguing against (or for).
> We're arguing about an imagined treat. ;-)

Huh? The segment routing header is far from imaginary.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email