RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 21 June 2013 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204E421F9E33 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.738
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.312, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.041, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zZENrR9aIYx for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3057221F9E53 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail122-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.250) by CO1EHSOBE025.bigfish.com (10.243.66.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:59 +0000
Received: from mail122-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E77F54031C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.52; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -26
X-BigFish: PS-26(zzbb2dI98dI9371I542I1432I1418Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h683h839h93fhd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail122-co1: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.52; envelope-from=rbonica@juniper.net; helo=P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ; -HQ.jnpr.net ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.238.5; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BY2PRD0512HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail122-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1371852055816098_10901; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.226]) by mail122-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB935BC0088 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (66.129.224.52) by CO1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.243.66.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:55 +0000
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:00:54 -0700
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:00:54 -0700
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (216.32.180.184) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:04:19 -0700
Received: from mail119-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.251) by CO1EHSOBE013.bigfish.com (10.243.66.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:53 +0000
Received: from mail119-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail119-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E9F3400F8 for <ipv6@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail119-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail119-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1371852050140238_9750; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.254]) by mail119-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EA82008F; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BY2PRD0512HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.238.5) by CO1EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (10.243.66.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:42 +0000
Received: from BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.17]) by BY2PRD0512HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.243.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0324.000; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:41 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Topic: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHObc3OGhJfZWsTvkmEF1gJL7lsrZk+wGpwgAEPggCAAI03oIAACdsAgAAi/1CAAAnEgIAAAmuwgAAQyACAAA47QA==
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:00:41 +0000
Message-ID: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F8625A@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C408BC.4030909@forthnetgroup.gr> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85BCB@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C48776.9070107@globis.net> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85FBA@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C4AD03.2050303@globis.net> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F86075@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C4BD1E.6030002@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C4BD1E.6030002@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%GMAIL.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%GLOBIS.NET$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Cc: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>, "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:01:07 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:53 PM
> To: Ronald Bonica
> Cc: Ray Hunter; ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg
> Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-
> deprecate-00.txt
> 
> On 22/06/2013 07:53, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> >> I don't 100% agree. In the case that PMTUD is broken, there'd be
> >> nothing to stop a current DNSSEC implementation from always assuming
> >> a default path MTU of 1280, without awaiting confirmation from
> PMTUD,
> >> and fragmenting the UDP packet pre-emptively [assuming fragmentation
> >> was not equally broken along the path as ICMP PTB was].
> >>
> >
> > Do any implementations actually do this?
> >
> > If they do, how well are they working, today?
> 
> Does it matter? 

Hi Brian,

I think that it does. If a DNSSEC implantation fragments every packet larger than 1280 bytes, regardless of whether that packet needs to be fragmented:

- it ignores the advice of RFC 2460 and RFC 5405
- it doesn't work very well today, because so many operators filter its fragmented output

AFAIKS, there are two ways to make this application work better:

- make people stop filtering IPv6 fragments
- change the implementation's behavior

Given that the former is impossible, it seems that the later is required.

                               Ron