Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
From: Nick Hilliard <[email-masked]>
To: Ole Troan <[email-masked]>
Cc: 6man WG <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:35:11 +0100
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>

Ole Troan wrote on 29/04/2019 11:02:
> At the 6man meeting at IETF 104 in Prague there was support to close the working group last call and advance
> draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05 to the IESG.
> 
> This call is to confirm that decision on the mailing list.
> 
> Please give objections and comments to this decision to the mailing list, by 2019-05-13.

Ole,

All the comments in this summary email still hold:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/lZ6ScXew_7q-BeVOK8L1dHEpVAc

Is a reference to the URL considered to be a valid objection, or do the 
contents need to be pasted into an email to be considered valid?

Nick