Re: IPv4 only apps [was: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?]

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 14 November 2017 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23A71294FA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:57:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uBnPpGdREKbN for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from accordion.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F78D12954B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h.hanazo.no (nat64-7b.meeting.ietf.org [31.130.238.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by accordion.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B82982D4F99; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EDB200C0BE6F; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:57:09 +0800 (+08)
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Message-Id: <50F8194E-E887-4940-8ED0-CA4FD9600093@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_96C52B77-BDEC-4C0F-9477-2F46569C39EB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
Subject: Re: IPv4 only apps [was: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?]
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:57:08 +0800
In-Reply-To: <f7baaadf-33c3-7fc2-d90e-872a0f69a5fa@gmail.com>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-4@u-1.phicoh.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <m1eEGbJ-0000EhC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <D43E103C-27B8-48CF-B801-ACCF9B42533E@employees.org> <m1eEHPS-0000FyC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <909eb642-b2a0-2fb5-8f41-297e013ae307@gmail.com> <E6BCB92F-615A-4692-8AF2-D993D5B9AF7F@employees.org> <f7baaadf-33c3-7fc2-d90e-872a0f69a5fa@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/WssGTAmaHc2Ge3Zx-Ek534a2vbk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:57:35 -0000

Brian,

[...]

>> This thread is about a IPv6 only, single stack host connecting to an IPv6 only network.
>> With a backdoor to the IPv4 Internet for legacy destinations.
> 
> And that neglects the legacy that most such hosts have inside them.
> I have a bunch in the host I'm typing on right now, which is connected
> via NAT64 for the week.

I don't understand what you mean with the above.
I guess this is where we have to be extremely careful with terminology use.

If you are using the IPv6 only + NAT64 network you can't possibly use the legacy IPv4 only stuff in your laptop...?

Cheers,
Ole