Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E4412021D; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:50:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=RJwtugxS; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=SAwTclfJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J86doWgBDO9a; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D246012012D; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:50:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15261; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1575564606; x=1576774206; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3e/l5Klj8uUi7eBwpJVfT7RN0G4osZZyJQiQ0kbUMNE=; b=RJwtugxS5P0cq2AXUx8a+a380Ky5OSzeNmn64HbYYVtSaj/tYqCq5CPO eQnh6HZudyM4nTNogJpMewGXGSng5Nb1ZmCufwh84alJXu0VZB2ReiikP R95xrJksPjfZvCOEyZIh2fcWgSdiENBFOjxwBIweKg/+Kr/UGhWFBGm6P E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:yOYzfxLmcZM/PzRPpdmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeCtKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXEH3Mf3ndAQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CrAAAqNOld/5ldJa1lHQEBAQkBEQUFAYFrBwELAYEbL1AFbFggBAsqhCuDRgOKfJYBhGKBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgBDAgCAQGEQAIXgXwkNQgOAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFUwIBAwEBEBEdAQEsCwEPAgEIPwMCAgIlCxQRAQEEDgUigwABgXlNAy4BAgwDo1oCgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFgTUBgRSCPRiCFwMGgTYBhRuGexqBQT+BOCCCHi4+gmQBAQKBSUWCYzKCLI00gm2FT4lLjxMKgi6HH447G5omhD+STJFiAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFUAzSBWHAVOyoBgkFQERSMZoNzhRSFP3QBgSeQQAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,282,1571702400"; d="scan'208,217";a="671112142"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 05 Dec 2019 16:50:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xB5Go5pd012571 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:50:05 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:50:05 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:50:04 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:50:04 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bk8VB0YAIU1LZkwOyl2xTaTeweOjKItxGBCe6Upt1TfShQvBKuLugL8xvrNkGEfuvJh92e/hLy66+ZkjjwR3yYbzRqtE2+piRUE+KS3AS1W6hKmBSZl7Prufwf0O0iBI4TahDgve1dAxZzEpOPdSL78TBiOYDH6dhl6A9f9lM6DNV3iCjZ03BPTyOaxG8jE9fqgwoZfLbSqFkEBJriC0B6ln58rK9Ceeu63aMx9E7lPHhgExRLMR19GZ68jQwWySJDduE/MG3laISf+R3+cW04gib8PxSLaDM7p924hr7vWQCv6nZIGNVSCXHh4ma5S36tYqMf7yxMHasE72u1rtsQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3e/l5Klj8uUi7eBwpJVfT7RN0G4osZZyJQiQ0kbUMNE=; b=S7yGwUiLR/BdpRyWZVrUFo0aeXAoT3rFaX8tefxqAY3/ZEEykMz8JLfM+Vk6dqliJvuUIlxhBCDPY03MTbXbYwv7XGy7deTnTSPvlqCKp0fSoFudLZVRUrkcZrIghiyZadTXEC4w63Nb95pvaIigdKi4JOAYDhubj8KcgRNxqWcI+M26kG5WL1aHQF6nFXN7fHBcWD0+4ZaRXyA/TQSbpxkGxV5mRqJadztmGA/GZYh9Ogq5FyqXKd+hXS4IH+q5s77Dq+glJZ0vHt5u9PpWMPkwINl6sXOqvaJ9jSm/9srnfxdCwsOSRBxZlK+8GRnXg2Oxjj9peNElLFtNBkHSWw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3e/l5Klj8uUi7eBwpJVfT7RN0G4osZZyJQiQ0kbUMNE=; b=SAwTclfJaeAieXkYP8KftZOC/baV1ZJny7uHCl9GguV3rN9H2Vbx36iSdV26NhtfkwBZCDIletA68Ux3QtB3nObxIxu/gA79F1oTdfb5d+KUsFHsPL3Kj2/dWBh2WomBHSRSD1WqeI90ekpkBaB4raXCdj+blCiS6WDmDY7dxNI=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.246.159) by BN7PR11MB2739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.252.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2516.14; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:50:03 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:fa12:757e:cca3]) by BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:fa12:757e:cca3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2516.014; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:50:03 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
Thread-Topic: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
Thread-Index: AdWqwAHVKZEn9oMNQKewBt9OvTlYXgAzAekA
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:50:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3AD3BD11-8C34-41FE-B88F-49A9F2561D78@cisco.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ddukes@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0cc:1008::f1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 16ec5ca7-cd61-4b29-0b66-08d779a32cbb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2739:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB273912B35B1A8FA87260EA8EC85C0@BN7PR11MB2739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-forefront-prvs: 02426D11FE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(316002)(6512007)(6486002)(2906002)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(54906003)(54896002)(4001150100001)(229853002)(5660300002)(478600001)(14454004)(8936002)(6506007)(4326008)(66476007)(25786009)(2616005)(86362001)(11346002)(53546011)(99286004)(186003)(91956017)(71200400001)(71190400001)(966005)(102836004)(76176011)(64756008)(66556008)(76116006)(36756003)(66446008)(66946007)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR11MB2739; H:BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Pi2yWN1AzPmIa+QPhJ17613Yn1OEZZBh7LAXKYl/W3xJe4OrJ4MR/lglSVbNU1KF2M3fPYMFVpl/DRPX2+b8UgSRwAVGg10W1E+8dYMZ3oyfn8vlufhW01qwMRwtzVsnlFkbcrxxfjlQPD0UnbDeA1Uggg17kV4YERb74hKReb3h7cFPrG9bHHVuhY4lFNRsyLpz9yczhJTTieeY2JAynKSfTzVvzNHsHwbvdd5JnIPFZeoWKoXVEL+BjLCyABdP4OTGhUYo1x44GR+bnYsCV2OK471tW3YTDfDOcqpD3LsLQjyTRx3zjVhLa1c3MAO+IgoTwQf6/RH++aA6RdP0Rt9NlsIT3eqZv9a4XLqjod1e53vftOS4mLptqk7saozEgB1cOao4Ve8sAZSAgLAOB4beHvyAJbJUmeko6834RDLuMV64B+kmXTlht8YdXS8F46RJ+qGwXnvXvhZ4zb/10OrOTYuA/P5aqlB77MEKD1c=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3AD3BD118C3441FEB88F49A9F2561D78ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 16ec5ca7-cd61-4b29-0b66-08d779a32cbb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Dec 2019 16:50:03.1481 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WqfUbZrGlQEYWhsNnp1GJwhjUfHO2rpXDy2icRTDGgDl6aMRptyikCCAlhHy6wW2xgvbsf5zvqoJtqz/38S/Gw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2739
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/X5cE3Xo0IaMZg85d8qd3M9chiuA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:50:09 -0000
Hello Ron, I believe this is the fifth time you have raised this comment in 6man and/or spring. The comment has been addressed in earlier iterations. Let me recap. With the PSP behavior, the SRH is only removed by the node identified in the destination address field of the IPv6 header. That destination address was placed in the SRH by the SR Source node, fully expecting the behavior. Thanks Darren Iterations: [2019-09-06] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/7zMgIwEY9AipZCCGO9KnT2CGH3o [2019-09-27] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/4_Slu3kkHwduZZPFJJmRUkmoTVo [2019-10-14] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/u536YH4tv7kKRq_b9_x9gBYpO9c [2019-10-21] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/4pikRli_HSECun9AbwfpmOF5KLI [2019-12-04] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/oDWLbRDqKCaF5Xa-QvKY6mk_D5E On Dec 4, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Pablo, It seems to me that the following are equally controversial: * A transit node inserting a Routing header * A transit node removing a Routing header We have agreed to move discussion of RH insertion out of the Network Programming draft and into another draft. Shouldn’t discussion of RH removal be treated similarly. This comment applies to Penultimate Segment Popping (PHP) in the Network Programming draft. Ron Juniper Business Use Only -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… otroan
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… otroan
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: … Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Enno Rey
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Enno Rey
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Bob Hinden
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Sander Steffann
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Bob Hinden
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ole Troan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ole Troan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Separating issues (was Re: [spring] We don't seem… Suresh Krishnan
- RE: Separating issues (was Re: [spring] We don't … Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Mark Smith
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Mark Smith
- IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Warren Kumari
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… bruno.decraene
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: topics to circulate Gyan Mishra
- Re: topics to circulate Erik Kline
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Alexandre Petrescu