Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage

Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp> Wed, 30 May 2012 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B2B21F871E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2012 18:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zm3SKkxa6HGw for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2012 18:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.193]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5ABB21F871C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 18:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q4U148lX016419; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id q4U148e15485; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: from bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp [10.82.141.45]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q4U148Rs001598; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/06101717) with ESMTP id q4U148Ap007333; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:08 +0900
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.65.91.161]) (authenticated bits=0) (envelope-from kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp) by mail.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/10031711) with ESMTP id q4U147ds012530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:07 +0900
Message-ID: <4FC57204.90901@mesh.ad.jp>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:04 +0900
From: Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage
References: <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BC2B4E19@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com> <m2pq9msdva.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2pq9msdva.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF02F1A11F619A7CCE144AA78"
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 01:04:15 -0000

After the errata was posted, there was a short discussion on
6man about this and comments were made that lower case was a
WG decision and it stands. My apologies for forgetting to
update the status.

Regards,
Seiichi

(2012/05/30 9:37), Randy Bush wrote:
>> Next thing you know, I'm going along based on this recollection, I
>> look up RFC 5952, and I notice there's now an "errata" associated with
>> it. Would that errata be about some grammatical minutiae? Nope. It's
>> specifically to switch back to upper case hex representation!
> 
> there is a lesson here
> 
> randy
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>