Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] 64share v2

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Tue, 10 November 2020 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81BC3A0E15 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:29:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25g5xseTiUIQ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9613A0934 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id y17so13128498ilg.4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:29:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mDYP+9dWVag3ynkWm6yuLeFTZQonxabJKaAlowfgdPc=; b=BAhlmEk7u2t+vgk7CNzsN8TH0qQ/xEuxca1qJsIc9kHFOeRwuyxTbVEWcyTxdATKiW ZywkVnnTVKQVZkW+Fuce7T0Hxkkgcq3sKZ01Gjhv1I/3ZD61NCscNV3UahU95dqMVrn7 X2aEq8lthbF2hyYHHANTzzbWUcPGyxGpvtz+THWzCH/D8xj4hQ36ov7CGPyWrWlOjmt1 ZAhnBVNJ7WHe3GgXsEpw9g6nf2WobT5WSsblK3PjdpLzqv/DKDALLuhHeXenKiUcsDa/ g4s3M5bG13D58BaOmoS3SCr2MdY8D2LYO7phevBhhFDdE/Km0hyt2w0WLe7M8Gnf3R/P 8uig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mDYP+9dWVag3ynkWm6yuLeFTZQonxabJKaAlowfgdPc=; b=qrvyblE+EFcwxggzEbXN6Yso5t4YD4CtKoqe+tFLIU847/488U6aRQ1nC3YC0qo7Vh o4eB8DW6f/A39g9tMBq5agAQTARtG7b9rJcLjx6XZv63d7vWVtcbbJTFBAuapS0l2juc Axohth4s6QIDjm7yKJKhYvwgQQFg4x9yFSOq8Wb2LBNw6dsOg9slToB6XBMe2WQXQXE5 qlr/scCmBhRgSH32qljDbLIZpU6Wx/3POvZ9IM3rxjiszn2/MERrFs9Pj6GTrPRUf4E6 tvib4/W8uk39oDx2ll7XA/7+IAm4ANtrMl+aAErrqcNEAqiriCh/D6zMXVdwYO9AtYw6 JNKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322OGemNtVS0RunOtm+dLCRAVB8YVToeLY/uUt+30eFUE7I+Ilt xbJQlWl+8EoxDqAfeycIElCe99WeIjzhwD+FHY4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHc8SGaqlIJ+Nc3y++1RxGl1CqkB6Z1nKIScxO51CIGT5aL8Qdr+KFyqF1bN4KV946zSTWdDUakfSEraYzz14=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1548:: with SMTP id v69mr13551906ilk.68.1605032962683; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:29:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD6AjGR-NE_sJ_jp7nAT6OvNkcdE9qoWuGEiiVW7r9YtsQvbbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0G8PjzE+pULte_AaOi=RHMLyto-YUQerGjQ=iOYnz+iA@mail.gmail.com> <0986B112-2159-4045-87F9-876B58F1D896@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0h9=7p+n=qnH1o1EHqtPrsaYebgvHciOJpP3=iXgNgKQ@mail.gmail.com> <0C739112-D8EA-42C3-BEFD-88C014D5BCD0@employees.org> <62bc0e56-85b8-42ea-c46b-4f2205dc435f@joelhalpern.com> <28C2E56B-1443-480A-B3D1-82E0F8CC0EC7@employees.org> <aabd41ad-1770-f2ac-77d6-62bfff1992c0@joelhalpern.com> <CC7C2B94-5A05-4682-8367-9072CC201C49@employees.org> <80ed3a3b-6e2c-188f-4c1e-c2ededfbbe0d@joelhalpern.com> <0188AC41-60B0-4BC6-810D-DC59CF9E4FB3@employees.org> <1931a638-64ed-f40e-07a3-67cf1eafb941@joelhalpern.com> <376D6BB0-87E2-42E5-9BC4-F3A2F04FA005@employees.org> <CAD6AjGSr-TPcGo7f9EGgoAahYLQTL68CUSq58LGMgD0=6GmRRg@mail.gmail.com> <8DC674FB-9F90-4C41-A323-62BD62934A12@employees.org> <CAD6AjGTYBs8YbHgCJJG84vgwXK4ZSCm65z6KXvZP9F+LdT_atg@mail.gmail.com> <038A830C-E024-42C6-917E-E6FF57829A1C@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <038A830C-E024-42C6-917E-E6FF57829A1C@employees.org>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:29:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGTQVtJBJ3=aZBsF1WcdSK2k9b1hzeZXM6008w_2vpo6_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] 64share v2
To: otroan@employees.org
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000097f7df05b3c4db93"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Xn-HoOVq5WO8llmoeBx_hJGvl4c>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:29:25 -0000

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:26 AM <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> Cameron,
>
> > It isn't as much an implementation problem (implementation of this is
> easy) it's the operational problems caused by this (operations in the
> end-user networks).
> >
> > Can you be specific with regards to text in the i-d draft ?
>
> Can't you rather describe how it is supposed to work?
> I'm not the one suggesting ephemeral addressing of networks...
>

The i-d does not mention ephemeral addressing.

To focus progress, let’s focus on the text of the i-d.

Perhaps you would like the i-d to say the RA allocation should not be
ephemeral ?



> Cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>