IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Interested in wireless ?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 31 May 2020 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960C33A09D9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 09:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7L18FwOT1GA7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 09:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B252B3A09D2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 09:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B5338A7B; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:28:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6F1g2wEtWNn0; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19CE38A7A; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E6E57D; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:31:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Interested in wireless ?
In-Reply-To: <3B25C305-4773-4983-B92B-49534003860F@tzi.org>
References: <A26FA9F8-72B8-4728-B978-6DDD271EC64D@cisco.com> <3B25C305-4773-4983-B92B-49534003860F@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 12:31:10 -0400
Message-ID: <30308.1590942670@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/XzaFFrLDw0a11H0Jey1E9Tkhq_k>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:31:16 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >> could we consider the adoption of
    >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless-05
    >> ?

    > I think that rebranding 6lowpan-ND/RFC8505 as WiND and using that in
    > more wireless networks than just the 6lo ones is a good idea.

I agree.
Does this get us any closer to routing /128s rather than bridging
wired/wireless?  I feel it ought to, but I'm not sure how.

    > I think we need a better coexistence/transition strategy before we can
    > use it alongside ND-Classic, as will continue to be the normal case for
    > WiFi.

I think that we get a lot of traction by setting L=0.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email