Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Thu, 14 April 2011 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D7EE0823 for <ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLfz76j5+N4I for <ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571F7E06B8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxk30 with SMTP id 30so1111809yxk.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=m1Q8oN4XkpQyKe28nH+uQjz8U2LpCDZ7UXHC1XEFc7k=; b=PYLDDeZAYaO3/+J6VlnuK9Pdnp5OJPWYXtCPG+AytNDu5Ws9tSnfxohCmPErNtbJuQ QaDiP+FjIjQX9AzS1TWj/1h+Bu05srpIkFXOblt7YZCgQgqxRJKGmgZToTJmRGGVzzg7 wX7vd6DAc3OMoA6maifJ+/NVm9qbdwW8dWBlA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=lvqRQ6bHyp745K4vDAziJMArf3JnoaC/xvPIEQUNyhd8ypmu+opsniseQSS3auzudy RrsZXd0UGBkm2ucsPFMYIMvXnzypE4wtagjp1vF0/7SjJH3P3bjL46MNHaEHu9XC5AMl NMIYPoqEnq00m96ZHsS7QgnL9L+DKSqwTjtn4=
Received: by 10.236.185.137 with SMTP id u9mr40377yhm.124.1302812649153; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.109.130 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik=FRQyL8HpH_OCVv+xnVbv9MO5Fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTik=FRQyL8HpH_OCVv+xnVbv9MO5Fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:23:48 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=kE0Q6xzOEYCqrifN=oOOj4vwFeg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming
To: 6man List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:24:11 -0000

Hi all,

after renaming to draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming, I am still
waiting for feedback.


I am not sure how the exact procedures are: Does lack of feedback mean
people are mostly OK with this or that no one cares? Am I too
impatient? Should I be doing something I am not doing yet?


If I am not getting more feedback soonish, I will most likely release
-01 over the weekend and would then start at looking for ways to get
this accepted as a WG item.


As always, any and all feedback appreciated :)


Richard