[IPv6]Re: Analysis of Ungleich ULA Registry

[David Farmer <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 8:36 PM Kyle Rose <krose=[e-mail]>
wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:21 PM David Farmer <farmer=
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Many of the names and organizations with the largest number of entries
>> are generic entries. For example, there are 135 name entries with some
>> version of "Admin" or "Administrator" and 52 organization entries with some
>> version of "Private."
>>
>> Nevertheless, at least a handful of what seem to be real organizations in
>> the registry purport to use more than 10 ULA prefixes. The limitations of
>> the new known-local ULA list in draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update could be
>> problematic for these organizations.
>>
>> Also, given the number of names and organizations with multiple entries,
>> there seems to be some evidence for the need for ULA-C prefixes shorter
>> than /48, especially if an organization's justification for shorter
>> prefixes can be evaluated.
>>
>
> We are not the protocol police.
>

Indeed, we are not. Nevertheless, if the data is to be believed, people
are, in fact, using multiple /48s. I'm simply saying that is a fact, and it
counters the argument that "no one needs more than a /48," at least in my
opinion.

You and others are completely entitled to your counter-opinion.

Thanks

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[e-mail]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: [phone]
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================