FW: comment on draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-01

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Mon, 28 March 2011 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBF73A68EB for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id igE38ttfrhBc for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114BA3A68DE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=3981; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1301299579; x=1302509179; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:from:to; bh=es6LCLXO0t4l5Si6rT+zJmSK/JPiQoChgoI2BYPUqm8=; b=TgEsHEqUln52LdvcROSZlEUpKPc7B70MQOySAuM9XUBmUE7osujrk7Du WmDpnfbRgjBUP9TiMYcpZOEC6Ugzfi3g5D4JW0Uu2CjUMFOzLJ+e/AsK/ kJM8oFZCM5WMMxeKHMVLXm2wdhCV99UZVzCfJWO9mwqv4VTLt3UDnmNtX k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AngBACJAkE2tJXG//2dsb2JhbACCX5UuP4x+d6VFmyGFaQSFOosX
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.63,253,1299456000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="419264480"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2011 08:06:19 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2S86JnL023696 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:06:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:06:19 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBED1F.04755F92"
Subject: FW: comment on draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-01
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:06:18 -0500
Message-ID: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C30121E587@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: comment on draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-01
Thread-Index: AcvtHlwCe4W7gAIUS5SdwNJOgbFgSAAAF2HA
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2011 08:06:19.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[05071370:01CBED1F]
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:04:42 -0000

Humble apologies that I meant to send this email to 6man but instead
sent it to v6ops.

 

Hemant

 

From: Hemant Singh (shemant) 
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:02 AM
To: IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: comment on draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-01

 

In some certain large-scale broadband networks, an RA does not even
include any PIO, so how will this document signal new bits?  

 

Hemant