Re: Additional Documentation Prefixes (was Re: AD Evaluation : draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-06)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Job,

> On Nov 3, 2019, at 3:55 PM, Job Snijders <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 11:02:49PM +0000, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>>> On Nov 2, 2019, at 6:01 PM, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>>>> Is there a larger documentation prefix than 192.0.2.0/24?
>>> 
>>> I wish that there was.
>> 
>> Me too. I also think a larger prefix could be useful. Similarly a
>> block that would differentiate it as an example of private space to be
>> used.
>> 
>>> Maybe we could carve out of class E space as a /20 of documentation
>>> space.
>> 
>> Sounds like a plan. If you write something up, I would be willing to
>> AD sponsor something like this. The biggest issue with repurposing E
>> space was that it would hit a lot of bogon filters. In this case that
>> is a desirable feature.
> 
> This is music to my ears.

Cool. Michael said he would write something up on this. Let’s chat in Singapore if you are around.

> 
> In draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen we are running into the issue that
> there isn't something larger than a /24 that isn't also private space.

I read the draft and I completely understand why you need this. 

Regards
Suresh