Re: [v6ops] [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-palet-sunset4-ipv6-ready-dns-00.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 27 November 2017 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6366A128961; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:28:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PTWoYauQKwH6; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:28:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C330124D37; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:28:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:40409) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1eJIWG-000LA0-1X (Exim 4.89) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:28:16 +0000
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:28:16 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man@ietf.org, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel@karrenberg.net>, dnsop@ietf.org, sunset4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-palet-sunset4-ipv6-ready-dns-00.txt
In-Reply-To: <9B47C38D-B446-466F-BE88-DD09E40814B3@hopcount.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1711271220410.4416@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <151155545267.9162.17152586924934799206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B0A6AF83-099A-4D4D-83EB-BA4B45D00353@consulintel.es> <2E863078-8E32-4657-B1F4-0417A0C95A05@consulintel.es> <18C3DFC8-45B9-4C41-8151-ACA840F00518@gmail.com> <9B47C38D-B446-466F-BE88-DD09E40814B3@hopcount.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YLMpDufNSxIh68LTnJK-9-PzKG4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:28:22 -0000

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>
> There are potentially 249 TLDs that are not operated under any such
> contract with ICANN, although I agree that the majority of ccTLDs have
> at least one nameserver that is v6-capable (maybe all, but I haven't
> checked and I wouldn't want to assume).

Quick root zone stats:

zones 1542
servers 4216

Most servers are dual-stacked; 539 are v4-only, and 2 are v6-only
(j.zdnscloud.com and i.zdnscloud.com).

The 31 TLDs with no v6 nameservers:

ai.
bb.
bh.
ck.
dj.
fk.
gf.
hm.
kp.
mh.
mil.
mp.
mq.
mv.
ni.
pf.
pk.
sl.
sr.
st.
to.
uz.
ws.
xn--l1acc.
xn--lgbbat1ad8j.
xn--mgba3a4f16a.
xn--mgbai9azgqp6j.
xn--wgbh1c.
xn--ygbi2ammx.
ye.
zw.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Biscay, Fitzroy: Variable 3 or 4 until later in south, otherwise westerly 5 or
6, veering northwesterly 4 or 5, except in south Fitzroy, becoming
northeasterly 5 or 6 in southeast Fitzroy. Slight at first in south, ohterwise
moderate or rough. Rain or squally showers. Moderate or good.