Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

Erik Kline <> Mon, 15 June 2020 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B713A0A1F for <>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yI5IwhzCqg8R for <>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854CB3A0A1E for <>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id a137so14934205oii.3 for <>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WH41Alq1sgD+RKVkLvi33mZTQ+DcFqeYUutbVs2XvUs=; b=uOdUnSZG9wyZ6us7K5h4VrlkRBOjxU/HfilO4Z4avLr6OPiOK+94JkjaHjdWU8Xjj/ XWbbkjolkZNdMBJVoHlG1u6E0vDseqRwAKGh+NCST8IEEMIJwFbT/hJoyZLKZ2WY4/22 px3blJBejvSfYcfffD0rvh0KDMeWanM6vLTpqQUhVq6T6nBIAqX3CGCzFHrpgUpkJQz2 5+9lf7d/qy+3De1UKBx2qVBIQVb7vwdp7xKddcyxT7MK4CbK2oW/o42a7ZV+gP7VQq7a kGI/n1ElOp3b5bAgbkNY6znQc4ySuvlyfj3bNELShWO1sFDg/qD7qP/yi4KxrSSnnWYY codg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WH41Alq1sgD+RKVkLvi33mZTQ+DcFqeYUutbVs2XvUs=; b=JTmgWNqqo8dC/ySSatukCf0S3JNjoYGwnidjMwpPEXkOaKpo9xhqE9N0LWEqR7pOTD eJJ+cB75ihPkefpeeGCQDAAPeMwyD80ooVlf5bno0yj8lDrFCbS9dYT7CaV9Dzs+Q+QW c5OfPa5745r3GOOcFgJAMLwwxZcf32OtxTmh3QoSQ/58BoACJaBPzl2UO5HATMoTawNO zoQdJwUICHyrGy3oPX6Pjs+O184vDbwAzvvhLjmuYV/4f1iZNdUI7QE/2MuqWo2hEDeX dcPxpbo9vj6gyLPx+yKtkpZDjOdVNE6fg371SDreNxzGIGDJZFnym3I1DSBS9nmKjmvv MuGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316JtjUI4mmeydN9A4VjGVbLbwlCwtRO7WMCSLFqUHzhMy5HA96 Ju7SbxmoKjjCO+wkf8FfOozlqWE/auKzpZb/LEo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmGo9qpb5bN5OE2xCEEyytgjRGtRxjCMHIpoFdzX6m6H/Num3VFpuIAN9wyHkErBrVWM5rnsKxBPbUUtJw8fI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:48d7:: with SMTP id v206mr7939659oia.97.1592202885890; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Erik Kline <>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:34:34 -0700
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
To: Bob Hinden <>
Cc: IPv6 List <>, =?UTF-8?Q?Ole_Tr=C3=B8an?= <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:34:48 -0000


It’s been a little over two weeks since the adoption call concluded.
Some have been asking for an update.

This is just a short note to say that there are conversations ongoing
with the Routing ADs, as some had requested [RTG].  I’m also looking
forward to chatting with the incoming spring chairs as well [CHAIR].

I hope that there will be something concrete to say very soon.  Thanks
for everyone’s patience.



On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:32 PM Bob Hinden <> wrote:
> This email concludes the adoption call on "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)”.
> There have been requests to contact the Routing ADs on this topic, this has been started via our Internet ADs.
> The chairs and ADs will spend the next few weeks reviewing the responses and make a decision on adoption.
> This has been a very heated discussion with several instances of non-constructive behaviour.   Please exercise restraint on future posts.  We note that it doesn’t help to repeat the same thing multiple times or respond to every email.
> Bob & Ole
> > On May 15, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Bob Hinden <> wrote:
> >
> > This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:
> >
> > Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
> > Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
> > File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
> > Document date:  2020-05-14
> >
> >
> >
> > as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
> >
> > Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft.  As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward.
> >
> > This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.
> >
> > The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft.   After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call.  The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list.
> >
> > Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group
> > to work on this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bob and Ole
> >
> >