IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-03.txt> [Second try]

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E98C12D847 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:41:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RypJf0N-BIOS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD8612D864 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u1so768259pgr.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:41:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=pVVcj233/pB1FR1UAuOAlrJLXsw321UDlx6ddPXshL4=; b=DL86G+b/lBSenfsHbRbImS0gcg8s3z9VsPoBkXi+ksvKm0ESxhCx3krVWv+6pIy9V6 5FLnVnqH4ZD8vT5g86Fv6rTO138zivia2wBBxRc2UM6wGGrSgg61uP8IBtjEBaeUg2RP UrfPYbY9035jqC8uafOn5w5OKp8R4lUHF8aSgbL29G7mIrFG1cY7WhiGnOQVbc1unWPt xM/fr3d5X2IeLmUZmj2GSU4EPVpv4SWFnE85jGDmzJ4zxdfp6h+Az9o/Z5KAI9Mjd2M5 rryH7lxrL3oabB5M1bDPU/YtPzqYVA2aBXM5oRqWxz/H7cfigaHDzeYZpCCVT4ugJxhv CF5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=pVVcj233/pB1FR1UAuOAlrJLXsw321UDlx6ddPXshL4=; b=WmH5O4QwyvmXd9s9RcR2QFlJ9dJ/V8kW+PWkeXCVwpKBWkbwM3QzEm2Zc6UbEnL0+k 5PTnvlOJI9Y7X/Ysh8kHYjlRSVpAFd801N8LfdalZAmopkwjE69NEB8J23H3hoKKX0ce W3nAEgkXx8VzZKseNkkrf9hpwsScL+TP5iphy0obFhdDy5IFyVEzgZdeJe4SY8Ohxawp a7c9q6OYbUYovgVysLK+TMV3eRUCNIRqcw24uStLDxuQG2mXJREu1KFS8J+GiakqiFP3 O/ZsHnQ+FkWerKF/EVM/xWr/TvSg2zd/YqzIpjA7uW9k+zXAATDA7XjTIAVklZy70yeW m9KA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDgkeBHgr+JiE4EuEhwoc+yVJxmvRtLh7n7XehBdoDoz0I9hbqa 52g/dxCngEITwvw+lfiTu1I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225B5TYwzQ2LDvM4h4WuB7LMx7+Njz64UDLdCCge3VrmmdckPUs67b18gs5glQqq2YJMvP6sKA==
X-Received: by 10.99.144.73 with SMTP id a70mr5038057pge.244.1518036092108; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q24sm6566934pgn.46.2018.02.07.12.41.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:41:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E7C80EA5-FE4A-46D4-B21C-D688C4298CE3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_804D5C30-2C98-4D44-AF9E-551DC0A82B09"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-03.txt> [Second try]
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:41:29 -0800
In-Reply-To: <01e0a51ed886470eb9f45a403e9b3660@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <20160428004904.25189.43047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DFBAB1B6-7F1A-4E10-9239-955DCD184A1F@gmail.com> <2f60e27d-f669-16dc-c1a5-de1b389b41fe@gmail.com> <01e0a51ed886470eb9f45a403e9b3660@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YnXw3acPHAWPzoqO1Z0pksHMvlA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:41:39 -0000

Fred,

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 4:58 PM
>> To: ipv6@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-03.txt> [Second try]
>> 
>> I think this is ready. It can only be a snapshot, and today is as good
>> as any day to take the snapshot.
> 
> I agree that this is a snapshot based on what we know today. I think what we
> really need is a "living document", but I don't think IETF process is oriented
> toward supporting that concept. Should we expect to see a successive string
> of (bis)es going forward into the future after this gets published?

I have mixed feelings about a “living document”.  At one level it makes sense.  We will likely being do new documents in the future that update other documents, but until we get experience with their operation, I am not sure we want to modify node requirements.  I think it’s better to get some experience first before calling it a Best Current Practice.

Bob

> 
> Thanks - Fred
> 
>>    Brian
>> 
>> On 07/02/2018 12:24, Bob Hinden wrote:
>>> 
>>> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
>>> 
>>>      Title           : IPv6 Node Requirements
>>>      Authors         : Tim Chown
>>>                        John Loughney
>>>                        Timothy Winters
>>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-03.txt
>>>      Pages           : 40
>>>      Date            : 2018-02-06
>>> 
>>>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-03
>>> 
>>> as a Best Current Practice (BCP).  Substantive comments and statements of support
>>> for publishing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
>>> Editorial suggestions can be sent to the author.  This last call will
>>> end on 20 February 2018.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bob & Ole
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email