Re: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070A63A00DC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pg8cqPcwKXay for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44B33A00D9 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE2C5283788; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0
To: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, qinfengwei <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>, 'Bob Hinden' <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "'Darren Dukes (ddukes)'" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Cc: '6man' <6man@ietf.org>
References: <23488ea0d4eb474c9d7155086f940dae@huawei.com> <006c01d62aa1$8c195520$a44bff60$@com> <DM6PR05MB634863122645FD4981B97F71AEBD0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <e4cfefa0-eeb4-22ee-6d9b-1abac21ce962@si6networks.com> <DM6PR05MB63486BC1056350B4E6B744FEAEBD0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <91723b56299e435a8debefab60ffb834@huawei.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <92e568cd-10e1-f6c1-7b81-92f885f0c90f@si6networks.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 04:16:00 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91723b56299e435a8debefab60ffb834@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZGDoTdFqbwvxYLaBfttHIdG--U0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30:19 -0000

On 16/5/20 03:44, Xiejingrong (Jingrong) wrote:
> Hi!
> In my common sense, the security should not be dependent on any kind of assumption like "you can't guess out the mapping", or "you don't know the SID".
> Is there any theory or IETF BCP to state such principle ?

That's nto what I was implying.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492