RE: What 's the process?

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 18 February 2020 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CA0120811 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:07:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=1YGBgZE8; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ANMKR1T0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppdTp4wlBTsS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A29ED120836 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108158.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01IN4eaf024672; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:07:28 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=OKsAFg9KtJZnMHniEaUJlSDbxqS3zqGrhYrlJmBVooA=; b=1YGBgZE8uzU/4rkr44KrSzwlHkthqVK9pU1DF8GttWR+YE1EHwztvf59LIgnyl/GxLpH iHijuL2l1OLfTmS3wdPqyjc/wS6Cvg+IlBqKRzu2eHE2WPVvSeLuYoxWfmuhLyEss5Do 7HA0IiT6Gw+nWewr44Iu8AHLQl2+OCtbWpeVVR2sEwoQm0Zhlk9QfDjVkjKjY56vVlUq Q/aH+0cuMBzXx1RlfmOsH3b9pjQh1iC0sCPl0k2+yGOTlCPwV7bE49rhLYQzdiGgFuvA nTgqRznbe1vTIpuiXHNUHJl1L+nbSKm5rF28qHgC9aGjebC9CIAo2N3Zq4Jt76fg8Rg2 Bw==
Received: from nam12-mw2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12lp2049.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.66.49]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y86r21xdx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:07:27 -0800
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Od5eCugWKuefp2fvqMTf6HWk6ofRehkWHuRZvQfRmHStA/Y81nWukPBXS8MtrHLb+dZ9kFTZKEZ8XYq7tchtde/dJO0icX1kHR5CK4ayZh1mwncg/tknUmKv8xU6sj6dj5L9IsJN5u/zgVvboN2XSUpit/qQRK2qiJd3xVrnyBeC9E329COHsol6VVQI0yg10pAfkrADXGddYO6V14hj+g4MfjGJ9vASuZe/EAG0kAL/n17EueQ2hXinQnVYILrMQAwldRR4QXnlIqSDmjbLbpL7u/gKN2IBb+uXPyAA6bSR+df9yiRbmbtxomRzjB4Yu1v06Stbi1IHLPMY+rAlXw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OKsAFg9KtJZnMHniEaUJlSDbxqS3zqGrhYrlJmBVooA=; b=OWWTWejzBbTZ6fUfKoGV/0gy+T0ZvnmLnGNW6VPnjT7AaTaFt7UoADJzmE4oW8KxtLAXNj9DgYAv/2sxjpZywxPSSfg9KiCOnxi8umMSixwchns8TTsjn6HHcZGjZsSQ9mwreOCFiryNxv7v3vI7PIx0Q5ZElB9TbDzhSDGvqf3kz1lGsODQ0p/qIuh8hVUTc0ECYjZ08dZTIni2vnD5sBYOg9WD8oH24CGv6VH8c2uSsO5RV1LyWibMx20KEdfrwNRjlntKShPU1QVf1TNd4/pjs7eVWOVxmbaIIvd5QBx5CeUfzZ/DgQmAAHihNgdozAxgeZ72Z07y1GpQ7s1csA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OKsAFg9KtJZnMHniEaUJlSDbxqS3zqGrhYrlJmBVooA=; b=ANMKR1T0Y7DtF43JBwsnHRayOs41L3YvLyujZnnBT9zOrBW7qOF4c8WuS2OaKYazYkjUw1yO4nQmGgRQhK59fDpoNKBA/qqwrsDm5CFF0O907MHZUdfMDb2RBsGzkMzpRDiBJ/q8DI1b5qWiFvXVDhyFB/JhaA/wKyZBd1h3bTU=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.178.224.143) by DM6PR05MB4988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.223.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.8; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:07:24 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdd:ea54:f213:7e02]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdd:ea54:f213:7e02%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.016; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:07:23 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: What 's the process?
Thread-Topic: What 's the process?
Thread-Index: AdXmRp2+j8roA37CTn+ijAU1LR1JcgAZNNvA
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:07:23 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB6348D001F5397DFF015BE22AAE110@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB0290463E@dggeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB0290463E@dggeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=rbonica@juniper.net; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-02-18T23:07:20.3523561Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=d58222e4-f473-4032-9705-98d7aa2bdf92; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.3.2.8
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1ef70a79-0f1b-487f-753c-08d7b4c75051
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB4988:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB49882915050EE2A35C66CD9DAE110@DM6PR05MB4988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-forefront-prvs: 031763BCAF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(346002)(189003)(199004)(110136005)(316002)(9686003)(76116006)(66946007)(55016002)(26005)(81166006)(186003)(7696005)(5660300002)(8676002)(66476007)(81156014)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66574012)(33656002)(478600001)(52536014)(86362001)(8936002)(6506007)(2906002)(71200400001)(53546011)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR05MB4988; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: yAaUpnUAUkOL9xEIvGoUshIb/5IVWWeKuzVqqA+cNM9SmbjRdxTkuowRzWCCzUkpQD50Mc1xfNt4nheUoIXEOl0D9WU+AFNcs3swJ77daIUu+Wy5RfBE2vrmvt0lktHBBioAiMndv2aaopgbvBkAZA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1ef70a79-0f1b-487f-753c-08d7b4c75051
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Feb 2020 23:07:23.4332 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: U5S6QH4qxq6uNBL2M+TAh189XSKLQj80+2qOkA6p29WgxTtlapn+Azg5MoSLzphpbSi15nEX3qSz/qHb0zAkTw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB4988
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-18_07:2020-02-18, 2020-02-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002180157
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZHjemAzJGFAQahOaF-6swV4UqWk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:07:35 -0000

Hello Cheng, Robin and Darren,

The CRH draft depends only upon the documents that it references as normative. It does not depend on any other documents.
Do you see anything in the text that suggests otherwise?

The use-case is exactly the same as RH0. The application needs a traffic steering mechanism. However, there are two new constraints. These are:

	- The security vulnerabilities that caused RH0 to be deprecated must be addressed
	- The Routing header must be deployable, even when the number of segments is large

In the future, other document may depend on CRH. However, CRH does not depend upon them.

                                                                                                 Ron


Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Chengli (Cheng Li)
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 5:42 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: What 's the process?

Hi Ron,

I see the related references to segment routing documents are deleted, including https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-00__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjrD0I-8D$ 

May I ask a question? What is the relation between this document and the SRm6 document? Independent?  If not, what is the process of adopting these two documents? 

BTW, in which condition that we can say a solution is a stand-alone piece of work?

Thanks,
Cheng



-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 8:56 AM
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt

Folks,

Over the last several weeks, customers who have no interest in Segment Routing have expressed interest in the CRH. So, we have updated the CRH draft, removing all references to Segment Routing and letting it stand alone as an IPv6 Routing header.

While Segment Routing may one day be a user of the CRH, it will not be the only user.

Please review this document as a stand-alone piece of work.

                                                                          Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2020 7:46 PM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>et>; Ning So <ning.so@ril.com>om>; Andrew Alston <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>om>; Ning So <Ning.So@ril.com>om>; Tomonobu Niwa <to-niwa@kddi.com>om>; Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>om>; Yuji Kamite <y.kamite@ntt.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
has been successfully submitted by Ron Bonica and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr
Revision:	11
Title:		The IPv6 Compressed Routing Header (CRH)
Document date:	2020-02-16
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		16
URL                      https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjrnJ8ZXY$ 
Status:                https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjuJwFxBl$ 
Htmlized:           https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjrnJ8ZXY$ 
Htmlized:           https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjsOwC5Gy$ 
Diff:           
Abstract:
   This document defines two new Routing header types.  Collectively,
   they are called the Compressed Routing Headers (CRH).  Individually,
   they are called CRH-16 and CRH-32.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjrjvNnZo$ 
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SZBw1bJrNzc15rJ32cZACDoLU6rdesCKqqb7L_Kk7fAG01S3NeZHhGXcjrjvNnZo$ 
--------------------------------------------------------------------