Archive

 Hello Xipeng

The problem statement is the next logical step, and I fully agree with you, willing to contribute.

The goal of the wireless draft is to present architecture fundamentals so there’s a common understanding of terms and constraints.

I believe that your problem statement proposal would be the first user if that specification.

Is that how you see it too?

Pascal

Le 22 nov. 2020 à 19:52, Xipengxiao <xipengxiao@huawei.com> a écrit :

Hi Pascal, Chairs, All,

I also think that it’s a good piece of work, and shouldn’t be given up.

I would also like to take this opportunity to propose that the WG start a “problem statement of IPv6 first-hop protocols” draft.  The rationale is: many IPv6 first-hop protocols like ND, SLAAC were designed long time ago; many things have changed over the years, e.g. the advent of wireless, mobility, IoT, overlays;  lately there are multiple drafts trying to fix various issues in a number of IPv6 first-hop protocols, including:

·      Ole’s P2P & Universal IPv6 Configuration drafts,

·      Pascal’s ipv6-over-wireless,

·      Gyan’s Variable SLAAC draft,

·      Fred’s Unified Stateful/Stateless Configuration & OMNI drafts,

·      Eduard’s Prevent MITM draft

Some changes are incremental, some are bigger than that.  Therefore, it may be good to take a systematic look at the first-hop protocols, to identify the issues and discuss how to deal with them. This may help the WG decide whether to make certain changes, especially those bigger-than-incremental ones.

Thanks for your attention.

XiPeng

From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nabil Benamar
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2020 12:35 PM
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@ietf.org>rg>; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Expiration impending: <draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless-06.txt>

Hi Pascal,

This is a good work and it should not be given up!
I support this draft and I want to add some stuff to it.

Best regards
Nabil Benamar
-------------------
نبيل بنعمرو

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 9:18 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Dear all:

I do not have much to add to the individual submission. It is up to the WG to take it from there or let it die. What do you think ?
Keep safe!

Pascal

Début du message transféré :
De: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>>
Date: 22 novembre 2020 à 09:01:00 UTC+1
À: draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless@ietf.org<mailto:draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless@ietf.org>
Objet: Expiration impending: <draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless-06.txt>
The following draft will expire soon:

Name:     draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless
Title:    IPv6 Neighbor Discovery on Wireless Networks
State:    I-D Exists
Expires:  2020-12-03 (in 1 week, 3 days)

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------