Re: 64share v2

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 10 November 2020 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6829C3A010D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:58:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hmyR2IVysos for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 417A33A0100 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id s24so13387239ioj.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:58:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cdkeEEcKhvEln5wQssoUjtDJo1POmyf0O+YICNzgqLc=; b=j9oqv4y7RRbMj4kLwJ51a9O1MvMC9n8rx8X6fng12WT8GHim/ZsWnMHbIGMc2Lagoq BYL1intRAwQOvAzJGRXMC94aV+CF5CsWNFDQW2WlIZJVPmG53Ng0MU43IzN/Ctr2nGwf OrjeQmrmagWMwTn5u0SnoAhqCquXfbICQDmCXOOq0PryrAAlnj5FNntPdlbBaKBegTF2 Jh3n/lq8H13fr6jRdgxha0PmPrXUYEWIHVNNw9R4OCiYOQfnZDxdsxBKVPdBcly3VAJU ioB8REA4b7FV+ZsM1p1tama9ZqCRQxXtex7hhMZxVxgCx8D7xl1sW5eePCOhIZxETwpC IHmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cdkeEEcKhvEln5wQssoUjtDJo1POmyf0O+YICNzgqLc=; b=Z4be9OUX0bPIHZewMflD5StqJijT3WHgpgYABgrdkP6MJsBE0j0DkVpTJMuLWm0p1J ouuNnbp/tM8j7SwTXEgpPnBZcQ0OJEWp1EcUIb2YU0q+gJUgk8ukSDGAcMcBBFxividA HWOgr3lnmXGFkOsLMVMU8xXObyNHLTNBTF5bFYOLTp7fp8J/2aJjuX841K+B1PKTCwl+ Gik0fJvBhDcHo36NTxflu6G+YMQllAVVfy32JE3rAnXjflmmyrjg/ejlk2DExXJoEIjr vAVV1TgOhQK67nnRJad5YS/gTvDcRuXgUjjsnDT/q6TUKmkTMstdv+YwZWARrDRgXevX dk+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330wxS3Wwu167IyXeo0dF/kXOH3s4d2AQdZvioTuE1yd8djSX0b fRlj3/bVs4nt4UdBgCcgBoxZNbVi+UzOtZYu6zX8UA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMkXAN2kibjhjnPLIyGUckXc6dkGUI+22OZtOb+cC320zP6gjOsLRH4LNQQ3vu8MyYTVouGT/wnTMAkEHjXG4=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cd02:: with SMTP id g2mr14922253jaq.22.1605005932318; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:58:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD6AjGR-NE_sJ_jp7nAT6OvNkcdE9qoWuGEiiVW7r9YtsQvbbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0G8PjzE+pULte_AaOi=RHMLyto-YUQerGjQ=iOYnz+iA@mail.gmail.com> <0986B112-2159-4045-87F9-876B58F1D896@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0h9=7p+n=qnH1o1EHqtPrsaYebgvHciOJpP3=iXgNgKQ@mail.gmail.com> <0C739112-D8EA-42C3-BEFD-88C014D5BCD0@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <0C739112-D8EA-42C3-BEFD-88C014D5BCD0@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:58:39 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3Xr2t8yN40kmq6S+gSMPMDkm6cVXaVM+doW-xPo_BTrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 64share v2
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075ae0005b3be90e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZK95gH73VB8WhnSrZieBpo_KlJ4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:58:54 -0000

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, 19:32 , <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> > 3GPP networks do have this property. The PIO lifetime in the RA is set
> to infinite and the actual lifetime is the link lifetime. By and large that
> seems to work in practice :-)
>
> It works fine for the directly connected node.
> Now please put a large network behind this link and tell me how that
> goes...
>

What problems do you see with this that aren't already addressed by
existing RFC7278 implementations?

>