IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B543A0ABA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arLmF5WEJTFg for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA5E73A00C1 for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id z6so463914ljm.13 for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=km3yhyu4hPze7IEGSZHf8Yqi533qqpU+NzkLG6KKfVg=; b=c8DyMXOV5cLuUPm/z4o3169xM2X6+UGnqKLXxL1mtwHJpl1q0UbJiQke/bpLEgu/Yy lNBpSgAwWYTexGBu9T3k2XH8UIIYh1t+R8EZYm7ktqCS7kWpSQ1U+w+9s8vsq+c95YYb Z4n3r4qZwpt80A5hDh8QgeUeUe3FLnpKRiNrxeoPQAEzX/Vg8cOr428uDGoaYMkYjfjV 9mqWlteFsJ2Z86Nmu+HChNHKrxc+AeyEgO/fFc9hFt3NTOXnVx78KSNxBCF5x0ysZ4QZ eBYZN23uOctWgU6nILMk+hf8XwlZJyBdej2uZYN1RjeJcbrLVwxZv65CpabRL8d0oEpq ctAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=km3yhyu4hPze7IEGSZHf8Yqi533qqpU+NzkLG6KKfVg=; b=tYbLzugwC3VjptB9ia+BXFYMrOvv8BEnvF/a3ioAIhfjnh/58Eo8ZEZeVAdcBi/97s fzmosopmh9sMLwuIPE9eq/mQ0aE/EWkVhpViQ5YXeI5n3nXJcvbPaXGVewvoMBrqXdbg o63hcHdytrWDUfbrOPB4Q0WPDmWpxtOTFFE+NOaS5oSHQrZhxECrGtV98m2FIW6Iovrv lHjAZZnk8pheQQPKyns4/D28mgo6/TWxkgycFyXfOZgaWEL6ct/6AnqurwJ+YmekoSXS VfQvthSIcqm7LnX7DOhKjqMuMowVt/VWzkYPHHHYIae4Oo0riXqG0l6o2YoXpl3aOprz K3VA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ok7JPFK29kUbSvlgbYUf+dr5tw36cOZLWRjIUPgYQ2z98unOU BNDp3iLkbK692BqmfhKKOcPvhEvimHihkSoHr74=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybfogqqRbk87BBw/VaYm4wBOqtqRm1KgMGpgxUYVHk8QrUGemEF7xWXh4nEg3dtKRIICQzrLjLBo68AzMnLKk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:54e:: with SMTP id q14mr2043066ljp.279.1590778560861; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO42Z2xDygUXTGwVunGSTMkZGMF8VePrPaXLSAJg14vAJdca5A@mail.gmail.com> <6DB604C0-2C29-44A8-AB01-DA697552C7DA@employees.org> <1C1F0496-33A8-4646-B356-369EA9ABAD33@gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB6348501B266FF51DD805C25DAE8F0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <70CDD965-C9B4-4A15-9ACA-FFE685D97129@gmail.com> <53AACAD4-5A84-481D-983E-FC2CB04DB893@gmail.com> <CC0E929B-4A46-4AE3-B6DD-2C759887E6AF@bell.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CC0E929B-4A46-4AE3-B6DD-2C759887E6AF@bell.ca>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:55:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW5qjXrtqcuQK=imdo-V+US_eWnt=6fH7=Q_pNYyUChFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
To: "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000958e405a6cdff54"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZUEtU5YwB2PCJOY8ZG3yMgUqoC4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 18:56:10 -0000

Dear Daniel and Stewart,
what, in your opinion, is missing when using virtual meetings or e-mail to
resolve differences in opinion? Seeing emotions, facial expressions? With
some effort, I can imagine them, add them to the picture. I believe that
the differences can be resolved if there's a will to do that. If there's
none, then even f2f meeting would not help us to arrive to a mutually
acceptable resolution, someone may still feel as he/she lost the argument.

>From the desk of Captain Obvious (with my apologies).

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:27 AM Voyer, Daniel <daniel.voyer@bell.ca> wrote:

> I agree with Stewart. Addressing these outstanding issues by email only is
> a challenge.
>
> When people make the effort to meet in person means they are truly
> determine solve it and also agree they might put a bit of water in their
> wine
>
> We could also have virtual room/webex.
>
> dan
>
> On 2020-05-29, 10:20 AM, "ipv6 on behalf of Fred Baker" <
> ipv6-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>     > On May 29, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Stewart Bryant <
> stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >
>     > My main point was that a list discussion of this type rarely reaches
> an acceptable outcome, and that an objective discussion at IETF is normally
> a better approach. Indeed resolving issues like this is exactly why we meet
> F2F at IETF.
>
>     So your point is that this entire discussion needs to wait until we
> meet f2f?
>
>     I think, in fairness, we have done quite a bit on email, and check
> things discussed f2f on email.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email