RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses

I prefer A. (public address is to be preferred)

Whatever the final choice will be, I would like 3484bis to allow the
policy setting to be reversed.

BTW, my choice is based on:
- privacy is anyway given away with cookies, HTTP headers such as
User-Agent string
- stable address is key for audit-trail (so Fernando's proposal is
useful here)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Brian Haberman
> Sent: mardi 27 mars 2012 09:34
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: 3484bis and privacy addresses
> 
> All,
>       The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on
changing
> the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over
privacy
> addresses during the address selection process.  RFC 3484 prefers
public
> addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to reverse the
> preference.  The suggestion has been made to reverse that preference
in
> 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones).
> Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the
> default preference.
> 
>       Please state your preference for one of the following default
options
> :
> 
> A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
> 
> B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses
> 
> Regards,
> Brian, Bob, & Ole
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------