Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

[Jen Linkova <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:38 PM Jan Zorz - Go6 <[e-mail]> wrote:
> In theory you are correct.
>
> In practice - at residential home or SOHO environment we rarely see a
> corner case that you described. I'm not saying it's incorrect, but I
> would say - very very rare.

Sorry if I did not make it clear - what I'm trying to say is that the
proposed changes seem to affect not just residential home or SOHO
environment but all hosts in all environments.
So it would be nice to think about other scenarios and potential impact.

> We really need to address the big elephant in the room first and enable
> operators to deploy IPv6 on a massive scale in architectural way that
> they choose.

I think we all agree on this (well, unless what they choose does not
hurt users and IPv6 deployment ;-P)

>We ignored it for too long now. :)

Now all my personalities (one is an operator who has spent a lot of
time recently trying to deploy DHCPv6-PD and another one keeps sending
emails to IETF mailing lists) are equally confused ;)

> P.S: I hope that we can have this discussion at IPv6 WG meeting at RIPE
> in Reykyavik in May and bring some additional operational feedback to
> this mailing list ;)

We've just requested the second slot so hopefully we can have that
discussion in Reykyavik...I hope it's not too late to ask RIPE NCC
for popcorn machines in the hotel lobby ;))

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry